Cited by 176Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMisinformation and Its Impacts

Deepfake generation and detection, a survey

Zhang, Tao·2022·Multimedia Tools and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11042-021-11733-y

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current detection methods' reliability and efficiency are insufficient, especially in deepfake video detection.

    “Current detection methods' reliability and efficiency are insufficient, especially in the case of deepfake video detection (Zhang 2022).”

    From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang 2022

  • Standard benchmark datasets are needed for deepfake detection because current datasets have varied resolutions, small video lengths, and a lack of variety.

    “According to Zhang (2022), standard benchmark datasets are needed for deepfake detection because current datasets have varied resolutions (for images and videos), small video lengths, and a lack of variety.”

    From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, T.
Affiliations
Guilin University of Electronic Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Tao
Venue
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Published
2022-01-08
Volume
81
Issue
5
Pages
6259-6276
ISSN
  • 1380-7501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7721
OpenAlex
W4205695807
Cited by
176
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 7
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Multimedia Tools and Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Cryptography and Information Security (GCIS201806)
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted Software (kx202016)
  • Key Lab of Film and TV Media Technology of Zhejiang Province (2020E10015)
  • Key Laboratory of Oceanographic Big Data Mining & Application of Zhejiang Province (obdma202001)
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Hybrid Computation and IC Design Analysis, Guangxi University for Nationalities (GXIC20-03)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deepfake generation, deepfake detection, face swapping, deepfake datasets, national security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review