Cited by 133Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMisinformation and Its Impacts

DeepfakeStack: A Deep Ensemble-based Learning Technique for Deepfake Detection

Rana, Md. Shohel, Sung, Andrew H.·2020·2020 7th IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud)/2020 6th IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (EdgeCom)

Abstract

Recent advances in technology have made the deep learning (DL) models available for use in a wide variety of novel applications; for example, generative adversarial network (GAN) models are capable of producing hyper-realistic images, speech, and even videos, such as the so-called “Deepfake” produced by GANs with manipulated audio and/or video clips, which are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from the real ones in human perception. Aside from innovative and legitimate applications, there are numerous nefarious or unlawful ways to use such counterfeit contents in propaganda, political campaigns, cybercrimes, extortion, etc. To meet the challenges posed by Deepfake multimedia, we propose a deep ensemble learning technique called DeepfakeStack for detecting such manipulated videos. The proposed technique combines a series of DL based state-of-art classification models and creates an improved composite classifier. Based on our experiments, it is shown that DeepfakeStack outperforms other classifiers by achieving an accuracy of 99.65% and AUROC of 1.0 score in detecting Deepfake. Therefore, our method provides a solid basis for building a Realtime Deepfake detector.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cscloud-edgecom49738.2020.00021

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rana, M. S., & Sung, A. H.
Affiliations
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Venue
2020 7th IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud)/2020 6th IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (EdgeCom)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-08
Pages
70-75
OpenAlex
W3080632971
Cited by
133
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing / IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (CSCloud/EdgeCom) (publishedVersion)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deepfake detection, ensemble deep learning, generative adversarial networks, manipulated video, sound manipulation, misinformation, real-time detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review