Cited by 425Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMisinformation and Its Impacts

Deepfake Video Detection through Optical Flow Based CNN

Open access
Amerini, Irene, Galteri, Leonardo, Caldelli, Roberto, Del Bimbo, Alberto·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW)

Abstract

Recent advances in visual media technology have led to new tools for processing and, above all, generating multimedia contents. In particular, modern AI-based technologies have provided easy-to-use tools to create extremely realistic manipulated videos. Such synthetic videos, named Deep Fakes, may constitute a serious threat to attack the reputation of public subjects or to address the general opinion on a certain event. According to this, being able to individuate this kind of fake information becomes fundamental. In this work, a new forensic technique able to discern between fake and original video sequences is given; unlike other state-of-the-art methods which resorts at single video frames, we propose the adoption of optical flow fields to exploit possible inter-frame dissimilarities. Such a clue is then used as feature to be learned by CNN classifiers. Preliminary results obtained on FaceForensics++ dataset highlight very promising performances.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccvw.2019.00152

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The recent common underlying mechanism for deepfake creation is deep learning models such as autoencoders and generative adversarial networks (GANs).

    “the re- cent common underlying mechanism for deepfake cre- ation is deep learning models such as autoencoders and generative adversarial networks (GANs)”

    From Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction says deep learning advances the creation of multimedia content and describes techniques for generating synthetic videos. The References include StarGAN, but our copy does not identify autoencoders and GANs as the common underlying mechanisms of deepfake creation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amerini et al. (2019) used CNN with optical flow to differentiate between fake and real videos.

    “Amerini etal. (2019) have used CNN with optical flow to differentiate between fake and real videos.”

    From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Amerini et al. 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amerini, I., Galteri, L., Caldelli, R., & Del Bimbo, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Telecomunicazioni (IT)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Volume
2019
Pages
1205-1207
ISSN
2473-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995516027
Cited by
424
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 27
FWCI
11.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IEEE Conference Proceedings
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deepfake detection, optical flow, convolutional neural networks, manipulated video, video forensics, FaceForensics++, fake information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review