The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brossard, D., & Nisbet, M. C. (2006) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl003 · Cited by 389
Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media
Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662519869097 · Cited by 231
Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr032 · Cited by 122
Self-citationPublic attitudes toward nanotechnology applications in Taiwan
Chen, M.-F., Lin, Y.-P., & Cheng, T.-J. (2013) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.008 · Cited by 72
Dempster, G., Sutherland, G., & Keogh, L. (2022) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.21010206 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Nanoparticle Research
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 659-667
- ISSN
- 1388-0764 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2040335018
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2
- The paper
- Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
