Cited by 7Neuroscience of respiration and sleepHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBiomedical and Chemical Research

A Physiological/Model Study on the Effects of Deep Breathing on the Respiration Rate, Oxygen Saturation, and Cerebral Oxygen Delivery in Humans

Cheng, K. S., Lee, P. F.·2018·Neurophysiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11062-019-09761-4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, K. S., & Lee, P. F.
Affiliations
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Sungai Long Campus (MY)
Corresponding author
Lee, P. F.
Venue
Neurophysiology
Published
2018-10
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
351-356
ISSN
  • 0090-2977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9007
OpenAlex
W2913111932
Cited by
6
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
deep breathing, respiration rate, oxygen saturation, cerebral oxygen delivery, respiratory physiology, mathematical modeling, cognitive ability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review