The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of Methods to Improve Treatment Engagement and Self-Efficacy
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive rehabilitation therapies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are becoming more readily available to the geriatric population in an attempt to curb the insidious decline in cognitive and functional performance. However, people with AD may have difficulty adhering to these cognitive treatments due to denial of memory deficits, compromised brain systems, cognitive incapacity for self-awareness, general difficulty following through on daily tasks, lack of motivation, hopelessness, and apathy, all of which may be either due to the illness or be secondary to depression. Cognitive rehabilitation training exercises are also labor intensive and, unfortunately, serve as a repeated reminder about the memory impairments and attendant functional consequences. In order for cognitive rehabilitation methods to be effective, patients must be adequately engaged and motivated to not only begin a rehabilitation program but also to remain involved in the intervention until a therapeutic dosage can be attained. We review approaches to cognitive rehabilitation in AD, neuropsychological as well as psychological obstacles to effective treatment in this population, and methods that target adherence to treatment and may therefore be applicable to cognitive rehabilitation therapies for AD. The goal is to stimulate discussion among researchers and clinicians alike on how treatment effects may be mediated by engagement in treatment, and what can be done to enhance patient adherence for cognitive rehabilitation therapies in order to obtain greater cognitive and functional benefits from the treatment itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning
Bandura, A. (1993) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3 · Cited by 7,655
Effects of Cognitive Training Interventions With Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., Morris, J. N., Rebok, G. W., Smith, D. M., Tennstedt, S. L., et al. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.18.2271 · Cited by 2,049
Toward a theory of motivational interviewing
Miller, W. R., & Rose, G. S. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0016830 · Cited by 1,603
Assessing Quality of Life in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment
Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (2002) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200205000-00016 · Cited by 1,381
Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory
Olesen, P. J., Westerberg, H., & Klingberg, T. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1165 · Cited by 1,317
Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Updated Review of the Literature From 1998 Through 2002
Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., Ellmo, W., Kalmar, K., Giacino, J. T., Harley, J. P., et al. (2005) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024 · Cited by 1,140
Cognitive Reserve and Alzheimer Disease
Stern, Y. (2006) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/01.wad.0000213815.20177.19 · Cited by 838
Clinical, genetic and pathological heterogeneity of frontotemporal dementia: A review
Seelaar, H., Rohrer, J. D., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Fox, N. C., & van Swieten, J. C. (2011) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2010.212225 · Cited by 609
Clare, L., & Woods, B. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003260 · Cited by 576
Cited by
Subjective Cognitive Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease
Rabin, L. A., Smart, C. M., & Amariglio, R. E. (2017) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045136 · Cited by 590
Bahar-Fuchs, A., Clare, L., & Woods, B. (2013) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/alzrt189 · Cited by 239
Mobile Conversational Agents for Context-Aware Care Applications
Griol, D., & Callejas, Z. (2016) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-015-9352-x · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, J., & Twamley, E. W.
- Venue
- Neuropsychology Review
- Published
- 2013-02-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-62
- ISSN
- 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6660
- OpenAlex
- W2011209707
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of Methods to Improve Treatment Engagement and Self-Efficacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11065-013-9227-4
- The paper
- Choi, J., & Twamley, E. W. (2013). Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of Methods to Improve Treatment Engagement and Self-Efficacy. Neuropsychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-013-9227-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.