Natural hazards knowledge and risk perception of Wujie indigenous community in Taiwan
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies have shown that experience of disasters increases the chances of better preparedness.
“Several studies have also shown that experience of disasters increases the chances of better preparedness (Guo and Li 2016; Roder et al. 2016; Deng et al. 2017; Hoffmann and Muttarak 2017).”
From Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar (2022) · cites this paper as Roder et al. 2016
Cites
The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants
Kitzinger, J. (1994) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023 · Cited by 3,870 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Flood Risk in Urban Areas: Modelling, Management and Adaptation to Climate Change. A Review
Cea, L., & Costabile, P. (2022) · Hydrology · doi:10.3390/hydrology9030050 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar
Heinkel, S.-B., Thiebes, B., Than, Z. M., Aung, T., Kyi, T. T., Mar, W. L., Oo, S. S., Miller, C., Willkomm, M., Maung, W., et al. (2022) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-022-05226-w · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roder, G., Ruljigaljig, T., Lin, C.-W., & Tarolli, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- National Pingtung University (TW)
- National Cheng Kung University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Tarolli, Paolo
- Venue
- Natural Hazards
- Published
- 2015-12-09
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 641-662
- ISSN
- 0921-030X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0840
- OpenAlex
- W2196455497
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 13.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Natural Hazards (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
- Keywords
- risk perception, indigenous peoples, landslides, debris flows, floods, disaster preparedness, attitude-behavior gap, community participation in decision-making, anthropogenic land use change, hydropower projects, risk communication, Central Mountain Range
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
