Cited by 28Earthquake and Disaster Impact StudiesDisaster Management and ResilienceRegional resilience and development

Impacts of large natural disasters on regional income

Mu, Jianhong E., Chen, Yong·2016·Natural Hazards

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11069-016-2372-3

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mu, J. E., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Mu, Jianhong E.
Venue
Natural Hazards
Published
2016-05-31
ISSN
  • 0921-030X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0840
OpenAlex
W2417026249
Cited by
28
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Natural Hazards (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional resilience and development
Keywords
natural disasters, regional income, spillover effects, contiguous United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review