The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance
Open accessAbstract
Policy design as a field of inquiry in policy studies has had a chequered history. After a promising beginning in the 1970s and 1980s, the field languished in the 1990s and 2000s as work in the policy sciences focused on the impact on policy outcomes of meta-changes in society and the international environment. Both globalization and governance studies of the period ignored traditional design concerns in arguing that changes at this level predetermined policy specifications and promoted the use of market and collaborative governance (network) instruments. However, more recent work re-asserting the role of governments both at the international and domestic levels has revitalized design studies. This special issue focuses on recent efforts in the policy sciences to reinvent, or more properly, ‘re-discover’ the policy design orientation in light of these developments. Articles in the issue address leading edge issues such as the nature of design thinking and expertise in a policy context, the temporal aspects of policy designs, the role of experimental designs, the question of policy mixes, the issue of design flexibility and resilience and the criteria for assessing superior designs. Evidence and case studies deal with design contexts and processes in Canada, China, Singapore, the UK, EU, Australia and elsewhere. Such detailed case studies are necessary for policy design studies to advance beyond some of the strictures placed in their way by the reification of, and over-emphasis upon, only a few of the many possible kinds of policy designs identified by the 1990s and early 2000s literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS
HOOD, C. (1991) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x · Cited by 10,159
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) · Cited by 9,299
Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain
Hall, P. A. (1993) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422246 · Cited by 7,369
The New Governance: Governing without Government
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x · Cited by 4,317
The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1961840 · Cited by 4,011
Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-5970 · Cited by 2,483
Thelen, K. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790997 · Cited by 2,477
Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice
Lowi, T. J. (1972) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/974990 · Cited by 1,985
Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas
Stone, D. A. (1989) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2151585 · Cited by 1,939
The Tools of government: a guide to the new governance
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2422 · Cited by 1,827
Cited by
Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions
Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024 · Cited by 499
What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program
Peters, B. G. (2017) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633 · Cited by 475
“…defined solution does not alone make these issues wicked, but may require more experimental modes of interventions and management, rather than more definitive, planned policy ‘solutions’ (see Sabel & Zeitlin, 2011; For another view on the possibilities of designing interventions see Howlett, 2014).”
BackgroundPolzin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B., & Schmidt, T. S. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.098 · Cited by 406
Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions
Rogge, K. S., Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025 · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Howlett, M.
- Venue
- Policy Sciences
- Published
- 2014-05-28
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 187-207
- ISSN
- 0032-2687 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0891
- OpenAlex
- W1487012808
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 65.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
- The paper
- Howlett, M. (2014). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.