The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?—A systematic review with an investor perspective
Open accessAbstract
With the urgency of climate change, and billions spent globally on renewable energy (RE) support policies, it is crucial to understand which policies are effective. Substantial scholarly research on RE deployment policies has been carried out over the last two decades, resulting in inconclusive findings regarding the effectiveness of mobilizing private finance. Here, we take a novel perspective and review 96 empirical studies concerning the impact of policies on two key investor decision metrics: investment risk and investment return. Only if both metrics correspond to the investors’ expectations are they willing to engage in RE projects. First, our rigorous literature review shows that effective policies address risk and return simultaneously. Second, we find that generic instrument design features, such as credibility and predictability (continuous evaluation and monitoring), considerably impact investment risk. A more focused analysis of the specific design elements of feed-in tariffs, auctions and renewable portfolio standards reveals that these instruments are most effective when they are designed in such a way that they reduce RE project risk while increasing return. We distil important implications for policymakers who aim to foster renewable energy and clean technologies more broadly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
Aven, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 · Cited by 1,713
A roadmap for rapid decarbonization
Rockström, J., Gaffney, O., Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah3443 · Cited by 1,225
Explaining the diffusion of renewable energy technology in developing countries
Pfeiffer, B., & Mulder, P. (2013) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.07.005 · Cited by 317
Addressing policy credibility problems for low-carbon investment
Nemet, G. F., Jakob, M., Steckel, J. C., & Edenhofer, O. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.004 · Cited by 106
Cited by
Li, L., & Taeihagh, A. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114611 · Cited by 184
Ray, M., & Chakraborty, B. (2022) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.091 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Polzin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B., & Schmidt, T. S.
- Venue
- Applied Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 236
- Pages
- 1249-1268
- ISSN
- 0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2910828360
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?—A systematic review with an investor perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.098
- The paper
- Polzin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B., & Schmidt, T. S. (2019). How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?—A systematic review with an investor perspective. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.