The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions
Open accessAbstract
Energy democracy is an emergent social movement advancing renewable energy transitions by resisting the fossil-fuel-dominant energy agenda while reclaiming and democratically restructuring energy regimes. By integrating technological change with the potential for socioeconomic and political change, the movement links social justice and equity with energy innovation. Through a policy mix lens, this research examines the energy democracy agenda in the United States to understand how and to what extent the mix of policy instruments currently proposed among energy democracy advocates corresponds to the overarching goals of the movement. This assessment compares 22 policy instruments to 26 intended outcomes for energy democracy. The mix of policy instruments holds potential for advancing renewable energy transitions based on the combined goals of resist-reclaim-restructure, although current policies relate unevenly across the set of intended outcomes. Bolstering the energy democracy agenda will likely require developing new policies, strengthening existing policies, and integrating efforts to simultaneously resist dominant energy systems while also supporting their democratic and inclusive replacement. This research increases the visibility of the energy democracy movement and clarifies and assesses the core claims and policy instruments advanced by its advocates, contributing to policy design for renewable energy transitions and energy democracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems
Ostrom, E. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · Cited by 4,529
Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · Cited by 3,763
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0288 · Cited by 3,703
Energy justice: A conceptual review
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 · Cited by 2,116
Jacobson, M. Z., & Delucchi, M. A. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.040 · Cited by 1,570
Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges
McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-06387-190230 · Cited by 1,509
Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions
Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 · Cited by 1,181
Cited by
Temper, L., Avila, S., Bene, D. D., Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Billon, P. L., Martinez-Alier, J., Perkins, P., Roy, B., Scheidel, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abc197 · Cited by 320
Shyu, C.-W. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102199 · Cited by 106
(2021) · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101996 · Cited by 60
Marginalising household users in smart grids
Tarasova, E., & Rohracher, H. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102185 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C.
- Venue
- Energy Research & Social Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 33
- Pages
- 35-48
- ISSN
- 2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2765646195
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 28.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024
- The paper
- Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C. (2017). Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.