Cited by 18Migraine and Headache StudiesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmaceutical studies and practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Uncertainty Analysis in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Application to Naratriptan

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the study was to predict pain relief of migraine in patients following naratriptan oral (tablet) administration by using uncertainty analysis. The analysis was based on phase I pharmacokinetic naratriptan data, sumatriptan pharmacodynamic data, and naratriptan preclinical (animal) potency information, together with general knowledge as to how migraine affects oral absorption. Methods A previously developed pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model for naratriptan disposition and effect was used. The uncertain parameters in the model, which were associated with absorption and scaling between first-in-class compound sumatriptan and naratriptan, were modeled using fuzzy sets theory. Global sensitivity analysis was then used to investigate the impact of each PK/PD parameter on the responses. Results Acknowledging parametric uncertainty did not improve prediction of the probability of pain relief. Global sensitivity analysis demonstrated that predictions were heavily influenced by interindividual variability in pharmacodynamics, as the dose response relationship was relatively insensitive to the pharmacokinetics. Conclusions To predict the probability of pain relief following oral (tablet) administration of naratriptan, a simple dose response, instead of the PK/PD model, would have yielded very similar predictions. The naratriptan PK/PD model may be improved by either refining the PD model or better still by specifying the interindividual error by additional data collecting with an improved design.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11095-005-6629-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. C. Peck, 1996, Appl. Clin. Trials, 5, 30
  2. M. Hale, 1996, Appl. Clin. Trials, 5, 35
  3. L. Lesko, 2000, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 10, iv
  4. R. Krall, 1998, Drug Inf. J., 32, 971, 10.1177/009286159803200415 · DOI
  5. C. Peck, 1997, Food Drug Law J., 52, 163
  6. I. Nestorov, 2001, Pharm. Res., 18, 1210, 10.1023/A:1010943430471 · DOI · Paper page
  7. T. Ross, 1995, Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications
  8. I. Gueorguieva, I. Nestorov, and M. Rowland. Reducing whole body physiologically based models using global sensitivity analysis: diazepam case study. J Pharmacokin. Pharmacodyn. Accepted (2005) · DOI
  9. E. Fuseau, 1997, The Integration of the Population Approach into Drug Development: A Case Study, Naratriptan
  10. V. Cosson, 1998, J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 26, 149
  11. L. F. Lacey, 1995, Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 47, 543, 10.1007/BF00193709 · DOI
  12. H. J. Zimmermann. Uncertainty modelling and fuzzy sets. In H. G. Natke and Y. Ben-Haim (eds.), Uncertainty Models and Measures, Akademie-Verlag, 1997, pp. 84–100.
  13. C. Dahlof, 1998, Eur. J. Neurol., 5, 469, 10.1046/j.1468-1331.1998.550469.x · DOI
  14. H. E. Connor, 1997, Cephalalgia, 17, 145, 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1703145.x · DOI
  15. O. Petricoul and E. Fuseau. Meta-analysis of the exposure/efficacy relationship for sumatriptan nasal spray. Poster at the Population Approach Groupe in Europe (PAGE), Saintes, France (1999). · DOI
  16. N. Cutler, 1991, Cephalalgia, 11, 222, 10.1177/0333102491011S11120 · DOI
  17. I. Gueorguieva, 2004, J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn., 31, 185, 10.1023/B:JOPA.0000039564.35602.78 · DOI
  18. E. K. Hussey, 1991, Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 49, PI-46
  19. R. Boyle, 1990, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 30, 405, 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03791.x · DOI
  20. G. N. Volans, 1978, Clin. Pharmacokin., 3, 313, 10.2165/00003088-197803040-00004 · DOI
  21. G. Bojadziev, 1995, Advances in Fuzzy Systems—Applications and Theory, 41
  22. D. Dubois, 1983, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 10, 15, 10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80099-2 · DOI
  23. Y. Lu, 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 72, 275, 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00020-5 · DOI
  24. A. Salteli, 2001, SimLab 1.1, User Manual
  25. N. T. Mathew, 1997, Neurology, 49, 1485, 10.1212/WNL.49.6.1485 · DOI
  26. M. Civanlar, 1986, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 18, 1, 10.1016/0165-0114(86)90024-2 · DOI
  27. T. Tomovic, 1964, Dynamic Systems Sensitivity Analysis
  28. A. Saltelli, 2000, Sensitivity Analysis
  29. D. Anderson, 1983, Compartmental Modeling and Tracer Kinetics. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, 10.1007/978-3-642-51861-4 · DOI
  30. K. Godfrey, 1983, Compartmental Models and Their Applications
  31. G. Wu, 2000, Pharm. Res., 41, 445, 10.1006/phrs.1999.0602 · DOI
  32. W. Meurs, 1998, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 45, 582, 10.1109/10.668748 · DOI
  33. I. Nestorov. System sensitivity analysis in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling, In: International Conference on Health Sciences Simulation, San Diego, USA, pp 117–122, 2000.
  34. H. Clewell, 1996, Toxicology, 111, 315, 10.1016/0300-483X(96)03385-9 · DOI
  35. H. J. Clewell, 1994, Risk Anal., 14, 521, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00268.x · DOI
  36. I. Nestorov, 1997, J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 25, 413, 10.1023/A:1025740909016 · DOI
  37. A. Atkinson, 1992, Optimal Experimental Design, 10.1093/oso/9780198522546.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gueorguieva, I., Nestorov, I. A., Aarons, L., & Rowland, M.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Gueorguieva, Ivelina
Venue
Pharmaceutical Research
Published
2005-09-22
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1614-1626
ISSN
  • 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-904X
OpenAlex
W2062657490
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmaceutical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
naratriptan, migraine, uncertainty analysis, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, global sensitivity analysis, fuzzy sets, interindividual variability, sumatriptan, oral absorption, pain relief prediction, dose-response relationship, triptans
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Analgesics, Female, Humans, Male, Migraine Disorders, Models, Biological, Piperidines, Software, Tryptamines, Vasoconstrictor Agents, Serotonin Receptor Agonists, Sumatriptan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review