Cited by 5Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Post-marketing pharmacovigilance study of inclisiran: mining and analyzing adverse event data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database

Zou, Dan, Hu, Qiaozhi, Liu, Ying, Yu, Lei·2024·International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

Abstract

Background Inclisiran, the newest lipid-lowering drug, has not shown significant safety problems in major clinical studies. However, its recent market introduction and limited clinical use have produced few reports of adverse reactions, leaving a comprehensive understanding of its long-term safety yet to be established. Aim The aim of the study was to conduct a signal detection analysis of adverse events (AEs) associated with inclisiran using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) datasets. Method Data on AEs associated with inclisiran were collected from the FAERS database from 2021 to 2023. Signal detection was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC). The analysis was standardized using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and focused on System Organ Classes (SOCs) and Preferred Terms. Results Of 17,307,196 AE reports, 2976 were relevant to inclisiran. The male-to-female ratio of these events was 0.74:1, predominantly in patients aged 45 to 74 years. A total of 102 AE signals associated with inclisiran were identified in 15 SOCs. Among these, 86 involved muscle injuries, liver injuries, diabetes, neurocognitive dysfunction, and other events not listed on the drug label. Conclusion The findings confirm all AEs documented on the drug label and in current clinical trials while also revealing new AEs such as muscle pain, elevated liver enzymes, increased blood glucose levels, and neurocognitive dysfunction. This…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11096-024-01784-0

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zou, D., Hu, Q., Liu, Y., & Yu, L.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yu, Lei
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Published
2024-08-27
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
1419-1426
ISSN
  • 2210-7703 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-7711
OpenAlex
W4401907141
Cited by
5
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2023NSFSC1696)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
inclisiran, adverse drug reactions, signal detection, FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, lipid-lowering drugs, myalgia, elevated liver enzymes, hyperglycemia, neurocognitive impairment, drug safety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Hypolipidemic Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Databases, Factual, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Young Adult, Data Mining, Pharmacovigilance, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review