The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rhizoeconomics: Carbon costs of phosphorus acquisition
Open accessAbstract
Plants display a wide array of physiological adaptations to low soil phosphorus availability. Here we discuss metabolic and ecological costs associated with these strategies, focusing on the carbon costs of root traits related to phosphorus acquisition in crop plants. We propose that such costs are an important component of adaptation to low phosphorus soils. In common bean, genotypes with superior low phosphorus adaptation express traits that reduce the respiratory burden of root growth, including greater allocation to metabolically inexpensive root classes, such as adventitious roots, and greater formation of cortical aerenchyma, which reduces specific root respiration. Root hair formation increases phosphorus acquisition at minimal carbon cost, but may have other unknown ecological costs. Mycorrhizas and root exudates enhance phosphorus acquisition in some taxa, but at significant carbon cost. Root architectural patterns that enhance topsoil foraging enhance phosphorus acquisition but appear to incur tradeoffs for water acquisition and spatial competition. A better understanding of the metabolic and ecological costs associated with phosphorus acquisition strategies is needed for an intelligent deployment of such traits in crop improvement programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later.
Amthor, J. (2000) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1175 · Cited by 822
Cited by
Root Phenes for Enhanced Soil Exploration and Phosphorus Acquisition: Tools for Future Crops
Lynch, J. P. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.175414 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationRoot phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: an underexploited opportunity for global agriculture
Lynch, J. P. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15738 · Cited by 774
Self-citationResponses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review
Niu, Y. F., Chai, R. S., Jin, G. L., Wang, H., Tang, C. X., & Zhang, Y. S. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs285 · Cited by 617
Strategies for improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency of crop plants
Ramaekers, L., Remans, R., Rao, I. M., Blair, M. W., & Vanderleyden, J. (2010) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.03.001 · Cited by 342
Plant phosphorus-use and -acquisition strategies in Amazonia
Reichert, T., Rammig, A., Fuchslueger, L., Lugli, L. F., Quesada, C. A., & Fleischer, K. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17985 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, J. P., Ho, M. D., & phosphorus, L.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 45-56
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2058636616
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhizoeconomics: Carbon costs of phosphorus acquisition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11104-004-1096-4
- The paper
- Lynch, J. P., Ho, M. D., & phosphorus, L. (2005). Rhizoeconomics: Carbon costs of phosphorus acquisition. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-1096-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.