The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil–concepts and mechanisms
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
THE ROLE OF ROOT EXUDATES IN RHIZOSPHERE INTERACTIONS WITH PLANTS AND OTHER ORGANISMS
Bais, H. P., Weir, T. L., Perry, L. G., Gilroy, S., & Vivanco, J. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 · Cited by 4,682
Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Swift, M. J., Heal, O. W., & Anderson, J. M. (1979) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520407114 · Cited by 4,586
Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change
Lal, R. (2004) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032 · Cited by 3,936
Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity
van der Heijden, M. G. A., Klironomos, J. N., Ursic, M., Moutoglis, P., Streitwolf‐Engel, R., Böller, T., Wiemken, A., & Sanders, I. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23932 · Cited by 3,587
Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems – A Review
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M. (2006) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5 · Cited by 3,053
Self-citationGlaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4 · Cited by 2,890 · cited 3×
“Work on terra preta de índio (TP) soil, the fertile Amazonian Dark Earths, has served as a major inspiration for the use of biochar as a promising soil additive promoting crop growth and carbon storage (Glaser et al. 2002; Glaser and Woods 2004; Lehmann et al. 2006; Glaser 2007).”
Self-citationPlant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Akiyama, K., Matsuzaki, K.-I., & Hayashi, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03608 · Cited by 2,429
Lehmann, J., Pereira da Silva, J., Steiner, C., Nehls, T., Zech, W., & Glaser, B. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1022833116184 · Cited by 1,878
Self-citationMycorrhizas and soil structure
Rillig, M. C., & Mummey, D. L. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x · Cited by 1,847
Self-citationLehmann, J. (2007) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[381:bitb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,714
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Harvey AE, Jurgensen MF, Larsen MJ (1978) Seasonal distribution in a mature Douglas-fir/Larch forest soil in western Montana. Forest Sci 22:203–208
- Harvey AE, Larsen MF, Jurgensen MF (1979) Comparative distribution of ectomycorrhizae in soils of three western Montana forest habitat types. Forest Sci 25:350–358
- Mori S, Marjenah (1994) Effect of charcoaled rice husks on the growth of Dipterocarpaceae seedlings in East Kalimantan with special reference to ectomycorrhiza formation. J Jap Forestry Soc 76:462–464
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074
Self-citationJeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015 · Cited by 2,422
A review of biochar and its use and function in soil
Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)05002-9 · Cited by 2,240
Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D., & Hipps, N. A. (2010) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5 · Cited by 2,154
Libra, J. A., Ro, K. S., Kammann, C., Funke, A., Berge, N. D., Neubauer, Y., Titirici, M.-M., Fühner, C., Bens, O., Kern, J., et al. (2011) · Biofuels · doi:10.4155/bfs.10.81 · Cited by 1,756
Metadata
- Authors
- Warnock, D. D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T. W., & Rillig, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Montana (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Rillig, Matthias C.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2007-09-19
- Volume
- 300
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 9-20
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2111269145
- Cited by
- 1,269
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 25.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
- Keywords
- biochar, mycorrhizal symbiosis, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, soil carbon sequestration, soil physicochemical properties, soil microbial communities, allelochemicals, soil biogeochemistry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
