Cited by 101Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementRegional Socio-Economic Development TrendsLatin American rural development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drivers of rural exodus from Amazonian headwaters

Parry, Luke, Day, Brett, Amaral, Silvana, Peres, Carlos A.·2010·Population and Environment

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11111-010-0127-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. Aide, T. M., & Grau, H. R. (2004). Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems. Science, 305, 1915–1916. · DOI
  2. Aldaz-Carroll, E., & Moran, R. (2001). Escaping the poverty trap in Latin America: The role of family actors. Cuadernos de economía, 38, 155–190. · DOI
  3. Alencar, E. F. (2005). Políticas públicas e (in)sustentabilidade social: o caso de comunidades da várzea do Alto Solimões, Amazonas. In D. Lima (Ed.), Diversidade socioambiental nas várzeas dos Rios Amazonas e Solimões: perspectivas para o desenvolvimento da sustentabilidade (pp. 59–99). Manaus, Brazil: ProVárzea/Ibama.
  4. Alexiades, M. N. (Ed.). (2009). Mobility and migration in indigenous Amazonia: Contemporary ethnoecological perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books.
  5. Almeida, M. W. B. (1996). Household extractive economies. In M. R. Pérez & J. E. M. Arnold (Eds.), Current issues in non-timber forest products research (pp. 119–141). Bogor: CIFOR.
  6. Bezemer, D., & Headey, D. (2008). Agriculture, development, and urban bias. World Development, 36, 1342–1364. · DOI
  7. Bilsborrow, R. E. (1987). Population pressures and agricultural development in developing countries: A conceptual framework and recent evidence. World Development, 15(2), 183–203. · DOI
  8. Bilsborrow, R. E. (2002). Migration, population change, and the rural environment. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 8, 69–94.
  9. Börner, J., Mendoza, A., & Vosti, S. A. (2007). Ecosystem services, agriculture, and rural poverty in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon: Interrelationships and policy prescriptions. Ecological Economics, 64, 356–373. · DOI
  10. Boyle, P. (2004). Population geography: Migration and inequalities in mortality and morbidity. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 767–776. · DOI
  11. Bravo-Ureta, B. E., Quiroga, R. E., & Brea, J. A. (1996). Migration decisions, agrarian structure, and gender: The case of Ecuador. The Journal of Developing Areas, 30, 463–476.
  12. Brondízio, E. S. (2005). Intraregional analysis of land-use change in the Amazon. In E. F. Moran & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Seeing the forest and the trees: Human-environment interactions in forest ecosystems (pp. 223–252). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT. · DOI
  13. Brondízio, E. S., & Siqueira, A. D. (1997). From extractivists to forest farmers: Changing concepts of caboclo agroforestry in the Amazon estuary. Research in Economic Anthropology, 18, 234–279.
  14. Browder, J. O. (1995). Redemptive communities: Indigenous knowledge, colonist farming systems, and conservation of tropical forests. Agriculture and Human Values, 12, 17–30. · DOI
  15. Browder, J. O., & Godfrey, B. J. (1997). Rainforest cities: Urbanization, development, and globalization of the Brazilian Amazon. New York: Columbia University Press.
  16. Campos, M. T., & Nepstad, D. C. (2006). Smallholders, the Amazon’s new conservationists. Conservation Biology, 20, 1553–1556. · DOI
  17. Cardoso, C. A. S. (2002). Extractive reserves in Brazilian Amazonia: Local resource management and the global political economy. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.
  18. Carr, D. L. (2008). Migration to the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala: Why place matters. Human Organization, 67, 37–48. · DOI
  19. Carr, D. (2009). Population and deforestation: Why rural migration matters. Progress in Human Geography (pp. 1–24). · DOI
  20. Castro, E. (2009). Urbanização, pluralidade e singularidades das cidades amazônicas. In E. Castro (Ed.), Cidades na floresta (pp. 11–40). São Paulo: Anablume.
  21. Chomitz, K. M., & Thomas, T. S. (2003). Determinants of land use in Amazonia: A fine-scale spatial analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 1016–1028. · DOI
  22. Clay, J. W., & Clement, C. R. (1993). Selected species and strategies to enhance income generation from Amazonian forests. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  23. Curran, S. (2002). Migration, social capital, and the environment: considering migrant selectivity and networks in relation to coastal ecosystems. Population and Development Review, 28, 89–125.
  24. de Jong, G. F., & Gardner, R. W. (1981). Migration decision making: multidisciplinary approaches to microlevel studies in developed and developing countries. In G. F. De Jong & R. W. Gardner (Eds.), Studies in developed and developing countries. New York: Pergamon Press.
  25. de Jong, G. F., Johnson, A. G., & Richter, K. (1996). Determinants of migration values and expectations in rural Thailand. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 5, 399–416. · DOI
  26. de Jong, W., Tuck-Po, L., & Ken-ichi, A. (2006). The social ecology of tropical forests: Migration, populations and frontiers. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.
  27. de Sherbinin, A., VanWey, L. K., McSweeney, K., Aggarwal, R., Barbieri, A., Henry, S., et al. (2008). Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 38–53. · DOI
  28. Dean, W. (1987). Brazil and the struggle for rubber. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Denevan, W. D. (1996). A bluff model of riverine settlement in Prehistoric Amazonia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86, 654–681. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Fearnside, P. M. (1989). Extractive reserves in Brazilian Amazonia. BioScience, 39, 387–393. · DOI
  31. Fearnside, P. M. (2001). Land-tenure issues as factors in environmental destruction in Brazilian Amazonia: the case of southern Pará. World Development, 29, 1361–1372. · DOI
  32. Fearnside, P. M. (2002). Avança Brasil: Environmental and social consequences of Brazil’s planned infrastructure in Amazonia. Environmental Management, 90, 735–747. · DOI
  33. Fearnside, P. M. (2008a). The roles and movements of actors in the deforestation of Brazilian Amazonia. Ecology and Society, 13, 23. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Fearnside, P. M. (2008b). Will urbanization cause deforested areas to be abandoned in Brazilian Amazonia? Environmental Conservation, 35, 1–3. · DOI
  35. Fearnside, P., & de Alencastro Graça, P. M. L. (2006). BR-319: Brazil’s Manaus-Porto Velho highway and the potential impact of linking the arc of deforestation to central Amazonia. Environmental Management, 38, 705–716. · DOI
  36. Fenley, C. A., Machado, W. V., & Fernandes, E. (2007). Air transport and sustainability: Lessons from Amazonas. Applied Geography, 27(2), 63–77. · DOI
  37. Finer, M., Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L., Keane, B., & Ross, C. (2008). Oil and gas projects in the western Amazon: Threats to wilderness, biodiversity, and indigenous peoples. PLoS One, 3, e2932. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Foresta, R. A. (1992). Amazonia and the politics of geopolitics. Geographical Review, 82, 128–142. · DOI
  39. Gross, D. R. (1975). Protein capture and cultural development in the Amazon basin. American Anthropologist, 77, 526–549. · DOI
  40. Guedes, G., Costa, S., & Brondízio, E. (2009). Revisiting the hierarchy of urban areas in the Brazilian Amazon: A multilevel approach. Population and Environment, 30, 159–192. · DOI
  41. Hall, A. (2008a). Brazil’s Bolsa Família: A double-edged sword? Development and Change, 39, 799–822. · DOI
  42. Hall, A. (2008b). Paying for environmental services: The case of Brazilian Amazonia. Journal of International Development, 20, 965–981. · DOI
  43. Harris, M. (2000). Life on the Amazon: The anthropology of a Brazilian peasant village. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  44. Harris, J. R., & Todaro, M. P. (1970). Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis. The American Economic Review, 60, 126–142.
  45. Harvey, C. A., Komar, O., Chazdon, R., Ferguson, B. G., Finegan, B., Griffith, D. M., et al. (2008). Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conservation Biology, 22, 8–15. · DOI
  46. Hess, L. L., Melack, J., Novo, E. M. L. M., Barbosa, C. C. F., & Gastil, M. (2003). Dual-season mapping of wetland inundation and vegetation for the central Amazon basin. Remote Sensing of Environment, 87, 404–428. · DOI
  47. Hiraoka, M. (1992). Caboclo and ribereño resource management in Amazonia–a review. In K. H. Redford & C. Padoch (Eds.), Conservation of neotropical forests: Working from traditional resource use. New York: Columbia University Press.
  48. Hutton, T., Mardle, S., Pascoe, S., & Clark, R. A. (2004). Modelling fishing location choice within mixed fisheries: English North Sea beam trawlers in 2000 and 2001. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 61, 1443–1452. · DOI
  49. Jensen, A. (2009). Valuation of non-timber forest products value chains. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(1), 34–41. · DOI
  50. Kleiner, R. J., Sorensen, T., Stefan, O., Torbjorn, M. D., & Drews, D. (1986). International migration and internal migration: A comprehensive theoretical approach. In I. A. Glazier & L. de Rosa (Eds.), Migration across time and nations: Population mobility in historical contexts (pp. 305–317). London: Holmes and Meier.
  51. Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3, 47–57. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Lima, D. (2004). “The roça legacy” land use and kinship dynamics in the Noguiera, an Amazonian community of the middle Solimões region. In S. Nugent & M. Harris (Eds.), Some other Amazonians: Perspectives on modern Amazonia (pp. 12–36). London: Institute for the Study of the Americas.
  53. Lima, D., & Pozzobon, J. (2009). Amazônia socioambiental–sustentabilidade ecológica e diversidade social. In I. C. G. Vieira, J. M. C. da Silva, D. C. Oren, & M. A. D’Incao (Eds.), Diversidade biológica e cultural da Amazônia (pp. 195–252). Belém: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.
  54. Little, P. E. (2001). Amazonia: Territorial struggles on perennial frontiers. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  55. Lu, M. (1999). Do people move when they say they will? Inconsistencies in individual migration behavior. Population and Environment, 20, 467–488. · DOI
  56. Lynch, K. (2005). Rural-urban interaction in the developing world. London: Routledge.
  57. Massey, D. S. (1990). Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index, 56, 3–26. · DOI
  58. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19, 431–466. · DOI
  59. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometrics applications (pp. 198–272). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
  60. McGrath, D. (2004). Regatão and caboclo: Itinerant traders and smallholder resistance in the Brazilian Amazon. In S. Nugent & M. Harris (Eds.), Some other Amazonians: Perspectives on modern Amazonia (pp. 178–192). London: Institute for the Study of the Americas.
  61. Moran, E. (1983). Government-directed settlement in the 1970s: An assessment of Transamazon Highway colonization. In M. Schmink & C. H. Wood (Eds.), Frontier expansion in Amazonia. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.
  62. Nepstad, D., Schwartzman, S., Bamberger, B., Santilli, M., Ray, D., Schlesinger, P., et al. (2006). Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conservation Biology, 20, 65–73. · DOI · Paper page
  63. Neves, D. P. (2005). Os agricultores de várzea no Médio Solimões: condições socioambientais de vida. In D. Lima (Ed.), Diversidade socioambiental nas várzeas dos Rios Amazonas e Solimões: perspectivas para o desenvolvimento da sustentabilidade (pp. 101–156). Manaus: ProVárzea/Ibama.
  64. O’Dwyer, G. O. (2005). A construção da várzea como problema social na região do Baixo Amazonas. In D. Lima (Ed.), Diversidade socioambiental nas várzeas dos Rios Amazonas e Solimões: perspectivas para o desenvolvimento da sustentabilidade (pp. 207–264). Manaus, Brazil: ProVárzea/Ibama.
  65. Oglethorpe, J., Ericson, J., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Edmond, J. (2007). People on the move: Reducing the impacts of human migration on biodiversity (p. 93). Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund and Conservation International Foundation.
  66. Pantoja, M. C. (2005). A várzea do Médio Amazonas e a sustentabilidade de um modo de vida. In D. Lima (Ed.), Diversidade socioambiental nas várzeas dos Rios Amazonas e Solimões: Perspectivas para o desenvolvimento da sustentabilidade (pp. 157–205). Manaus, Brazil: ProVárzea.
  67. Parker, E. P. (Ed.). (1985). The Amazon caboclo: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary, Department of Anthropology.
  68. Parry, L. (2009). Spatial changes in Amazonian non-timber resource use. Norwich: University of East Anglia.
  69. Parry, L., Peres, C. A., Day, B., & Amaral, S. (2010). Rural-urban migration brings conservation threats and opportunities to Amazonian watersheds. Conservation Letters, 3, 251–259. · DOI
  70. Perz, S. G. (2002). Household life cycles and secondary forest cover among small farm colonists in the Amazon. World Development, 30(6), 1009–1027. · DOI
  71. Perz, S. G. (2006). Migrant characteristics and land-use/land-cover change in the Pan-Amazon Basin: A comparative analysis of Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador and Perú. In W. De Jong, L. Tuck-Po, & A. Ken-ichi (Eds.), The social ecology of tropical forests: Migration, population and frontiers. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.
  72. Perz, S. G., Aramburú, C., & Bremner, J. (2005). Population, land use and deforestation in the Pan Amazon Basin: A Comparison of Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú and Venezuela. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(1), 23–49. · DOI
  73. Perz, S., Walker, R., & Caldas, M. (2006). Beyond population and environment: Household demographic life cycles and land use allocation among small farms in the Amazon. Human Ecology, 34(6), 829–849. · DOI
  74. Phillips, O. (1993). The potential for harvesting fruits in tropical rainforests: New data from Amazonian Peru. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 18–38. · DOI
  75. Pinedo-Vasquez, M., & Padoch, C. (2009). Urban, rural and in-between: Multi-sited households mobility and resource management in the Amazon flood plain. In M. N. Alexiades (Ed.), Mobility and migration in indigenous Amazonia: Contemporary ethnoecological perspectives (pp. 86–96). New York: Berghahn Books. · DOI
  76. Ravenstein, E. G. (1889). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52, 241–305. · DOI
  77. Rhoda, R. (1983). Rural development and urban migration: Can we keep them down on the farm? International Migration Review, 17, 34–64. · DOI
  78. Rodrigues, A. S. L., Ewers, R. M., Parry, L., Souza, C., Jr., Verissimo, A., & Balmford, A. (2009). Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science, 324, 1435–1437. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Rudel, T. K., Coomes, O. T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J., et al. (2005). Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change Part A, 15, 23–31. · DOI · Paper page
  80. Sawyer, D. (1987). Urbanização da fronteira agrícola no Brasil. In L. Lavinas (Ed.), Urbanização da fronteira (pp. 43–57). Rio de Janeiro: Publipur, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
  81. Shanley, P., Luz, L., & Swingland, I. R. (2002). The faint promise of a distant market: A survey of Belem’s trade in non-timber forest products. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 615–636. · DOI
  82. Smith, N. J. H. (1978). Human exploitation of terra firme fauna in Amazonia. Ciência e Cultura, 30, 17–23.
  83. Snrech, S. (1996). Etats des reflexions sur les transformations de l’agriculture dans le Sahel. Paris: Clube du Sahel/OCDE.
  84. Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2007). Avaliando o impacto do programa Bolsa Família: Uma comparação com programas de transferência condicionada de renda de outros paises. IPC evaluation note. Brasília: International Poverty Centre.
  85. Stark, O. (1991). The migration of labor. Oxford: Blackwell.
  86. Steward, A. (2007). Nobody farms here anymore: Livelihood diversification in the Amazonian community of Carvão, a historical perspective. Agriculture and Human Values, 24, 75–92. · DOI
  87. Stoian, D. (2005). Making the best of two worlds: Rural and peri-urban livelihood options sustained by nontimber forest products from the Bolivian Amazon. World Development, 33, 1473–1490. · DOI
  88. Stoian, D., & Henkemans, A. B. (2000). Between extractivism and peasant agriculture: Differentiation of rural settlements in the Bolivian Amazon. International Tree Crops Journal, 10, 299–319. · DOI
  89. Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labour migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. American Economic Review, 59, 138–148.
  90. Torres, H., Bichir, R., & Carpim, T. (2006). Uma pobreza diferente? Novos Estudos, 74, 17–22. · DOI
  91. Vandermeer, J., & Perfecto, I. (2007). Tropical conservation and grassroots social movements: Ecological theory and social justice. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 88, 171–175. · DOI
  92. Viana, V., & Campos, M. T. (2007). Bolsa floresta: Recompensa para quem conserva a floresta em pé. Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil: Secretaria do Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável (SDS).
  93. von Thunen, J. H. (1826). Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalokonomie, Part I. Hamburg: Pethes.
  94. Walker, R., Moran, E., & Anselin, L. (2000). Deforestation and cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: External capital and household processes. World Development, 28, 683–699. · DOI · Paper page
  95. Winklerprins, A. (2002). Seasonal floodplain-upland migration along the lower Amazon River. Geographical Review, 92, 415–431. · DOI
  96. Wolpert, J. (1965). Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 15, 159–169. · DOI
  97. World Bank. (2003). Rural poverty alleviation in Brazil: Toward an integrated strategy. Washington, D.C: The World Bank. · DOI
  98. Wratten, E. (1995). Conceptualizing urban poverty. Environment and Urbanization, 7, 11–38. · DOI
  99. Wright, S. J., & Muller-Landau, H. C. (2006). The future of tropical forest species. Biotropica, 38, 287–301. · DOI
  100. Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. The Geographical Review, 61, 219–249. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Parry, L., Day, B., Amaral, S., & Peres, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
Corresponding author
Parry, Luke
Venue
Population and Environment
Published
2010-10-23
Volume
32
Issue
2-3
Pages
137-176
ISSN
  • 0199-0039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7810
OpenAlex
W1983428537
Cited by
101
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Population and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Latin American rural development
Keywords
rural-urban migration, rural exodus, riverine settlement, public service delivery, school accessibility, transportation costs, settlement abandonment, rural livelihoods, payment for ecosystem services, remote rural areas, Brazilian Amazon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review