Cited by 330Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesLatin American rural development

Boom-and-Bust Development Patterns Across the Amazon Deforestation Frontier

Rodrigues, Ana S. L., Ewers, Robert M., Parry, Luke, Souza, Carlos, Veríssimo, Adalberto, Balmford, Andrew·2009·Science

Abstract

Boom and Bust: The Brazilian Amazon is renowned for its biodiversity and for its influence on climate regulation and geochemical cycles. It is also one of the country's poorest regions. For decades, much economic development has been pursued through conversion of forest for agriculture and cattle-ranching. Rodrigues et al. (p. 1435 ) investigated whether this pattern of land use brings lasting prosperity by analyzing data on the economic development of nearly 300 municipalities across the deforestation frontier. Relative development, in terms of life expectancy, literacy, and standard of living, increases as deforestation begins but then declines again as the frontier passes through. As a result, pre- and postfrontier levels of development are similarly low, indicating a pattern of boom and bust.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1174002

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cross-sectional boom-bust results are a spurious artifact of spatial correlation, driven primarily by large, multifaceted, unobserved differences between municipalities in and around Amazonas and Maranhão.

    “We show that the cross sectional results are a spurious artifact of spatial correlation, driven primarily by the large, multifaceted (and unobserved) differences between municipalities in the states of Amazonas and Maranhão.”

    From Boom-bust patterns in the Brazilian Amazon (2015) · cites this paper as Rodrigues et al. (2009)

  • Census sector data presents a finer spatial scale than the municipal data traditionally used in socio-economic studies.

    “As IBGE raw data are produced for 37,295 census sectors covering the entire Amazon, whereas there are only 775 Amazonian municipalities, the census sector data presents a finer spatial scale than the municipal data traditionally used in socio-economic studies (e.g.Rodrigues et al., 2009, Celentano et al., 2012and Weinhold et al., 2015).”
  • In the late 2000s, seminal studies evidenced a boom-and-bust development pattern in the Brazilian Amazon.

    “In the late 2000s, seminal studies evidenced a boom-and-bust development pattern (Rodrigues et al., 2009, Celentano and Veríssimo, 2007and Celentano et al., 2012).”
  • The frontier classification proposed by Rodrigues et al. (2009) is not appropriate for the study because it is not inclusive; cells with a moderate extent of deforestation and low deforestation activity remain unclassified.

    “In this regard, the frontier classification proposed by Rodrigues et al. (2009) is not appropriate since it is not inclusive.Indeed, cells with a moderate extent of deforestation and low deforestation activity remain unclassified (white cells in Fig. 1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. D. Carr Prog. Hum. Geogr. 10.1177/0309132508096031 (2008). · DOI
  2. D. White et al . in Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation A. Anglesen D. Kaimowitz Eds. (CABI Wallingford UK 2001) pp. 91–111.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Ewers, R. M., Parry, L., Souza, C., Veríssimo, A., & Balmford, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • IMAZON–Amazon Institute of People and the Environment, Belém, PA, Brazil.
  • Imazon (BR)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Rodrigues, Ana S. L.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-06-12
Volume
324
Issue
5933
Pages
1435-1437
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2058042183
Cited by
330
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 29
FWCI
19.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Latin American rural development
Keywords
Amazon deforestation, deforestation frontiers, human development, economic development, cattle ranching, logging, forest conversion, living standards, literacy, life expectancy, ecosystem services, financial incentives, development policy, Brazilian Amazon
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Brazil, Cities, Conservation of Natural Resources, Educational Status, Humans, Income, Life Expectancy, Population Dynamics, Socioeconomic Factors, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review