Cited by 50Health Policy Implementation ScienceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The Role of Behavior Observation in Measurement Systems for Randomized Prevention Trials

Snyder, James, Reid, John, Stoolmiller, Mike, Howe, George, Brown, Hendricks, Dagne, Getachew, Cross, Wendi·2006·Prevention Science

Abstract

The role of behavior observation in theory-driven prevention intervention trials is examined. A model is presented to guide choice of strategies for the measurement of five core elements in theoretically informed, randomized prevention trials: (1) training intervention agents, (2) delivery of key intervention conditions by intervention agents, (3) responses of clients to intervention conditions, (4) short-term risk reduction in targeted client behaviors, and (5) long-term change in client adjustment. It is argued that the social processes typically thought to mediate interventionist training (Element 1) and the efficacy of psychosocial interventions (Elements 2 and 3) may be powerfully captured by behavior observation. It is also argued that behavior observation has advantages in the measurement of short-term change (Element 4) engendered by intervention, including sensitivity to behavior change and blinding to intervention status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-005-0020-3

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snyder, J., Reid, J., Stoolmiller, M., Howe, G., Brown, H., Dagne, G., & Cross, W.
Affiliations
  • Wichita State University (US)
  • Oregon Social Learning Center (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Snyder, James
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2006-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
43-56
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2053152804
Cited by
50
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Holmes Museum Of Anthropology (Wichita State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh059855-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (3P30-MH46690-13S1, R01 MH57342, R01MH40859, MH59855, T32 MH-18911, T32MH018911, R01MH040859, P30MH046690, R01MH057342)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA015409)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
behavioral observation, prevention trials, randomized controlled trials, intervention fidelity, interventionist training, risk mitigation, blinding, psychosocial interventions, measurement systems
MeSH terms
Child, Child Behavior, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Parents, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Observation, Conduct Disorder, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review