Cited by 97Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsEducation and Military Integration

After deployment, adaptive parenting tools: 1-year outcomes of an evidence-based parenting program for military families following deployment

Open access
Gewirtz, Abigail H., DeGarmo, David S., Zamir, Osnat·2018·Prevention Science

Abstract

Despite significant stressors facing military families over the past 15 years of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, no parenting programs adapted or developed for military families with school-aged children have been rigorously tested. We present outcome data from the first randomized controlled trial of a behavioral parent training program for families with a parent deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan. In the present study, 336 primarily National Guard and Reserve families with 4-12-year-old children were recruited from a Midwestern state. At least one parent in each family had deployed to the recent conflicts: Operations Iraqi or Enduring Freedom, or New Dawn (OIF/OEF/OND). Families were randomized to a group-based parenting program (After Deployment, Adaptive Parenting Tools (ADAPT)) or web and print resources-as-usual. Using a social interaction learning framework, we hypothesized an indirect effects model: that the intervention would improve parenting, which, in turn, would be associated with improvements in child outcomes. Applying intent-to-treat analyses, we examined the program's effect on observed parenting, and children's adjustment at 12-months post baseline. Controlling for demographic (marital status, length, child gender), deployment variables (number of deployments), and baseline values, families randomized to the ADAPT intervention showed significantly improved observed parenting compared to those in the comparison group. Observed parenting, in turn, was associated with significant improvements in child adjustment. These findings present the first evidence for the effectiveness of a parenting program for deployed military families with school-aged children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-017-0839-4

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Gewirtz 2018, the attrition rate was approximately 15%.

    “There was a reasonably high attrition rate, approximately 15%.”

    From Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents (2024) · cites this paper as Gewirtz 2018

    The Method section (page unavailable) reports that 81% of mothers and 76.8% of fathers completed the T3 assessment. Those figures imply attrition of 19% and 23.2%, respectively, rather than approximately 15%. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Gewirtz 2018, the methods used for the intention-to-treat analysis were not reported.

    “An intent-totreat analysis was undertaken, but the methods used to do this were not reported in the study.”

    From Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents (2024) · cites this paper as Gewirtz 2018

    The Method > Measures section explicitly reports how the intent-to-treat analysis was conducted: assignment to ADAPT was coded 1 and control assignment 0, and the hypotheses were tested using structural equation path modeling in Mplus 7.4. It also describes full-information maximum likelihood for handling missing data. Thus, the paper does report analysis methods, contrary to the claim. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study assessed parenting skills using both a self-report measure and a separate observational measure.

    “One study assessed parenting skills using a self-report measure and a separate observational measure (Gewirtz 2018).”

    From Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents (2024) · cites this paper as Gewirtz 2018

    The Method > Measures section says parenting practices were scored from direct observations of parent–child interactions. It describes self-report measures of child adjustment, but not a separate self-report measure of parenting skills; the Discussion’s comparison with parent-report measures does not establish that one was used in this study. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three studies included multiple respondents for child emotional and behavioural adjustment, parenting skills, and parent mindfulness outcomes.

    “Three studies included multiple respondents for child emotional and behavioural adjustment, parenting skills, and parent mindfulness outcomes, including mother, father and/or child reports (Coatsworth 2010; Coatsworth 2015; Gewirtz 2018).”

    From Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents (2024) · cites this paper as Gewirtz 2018

    The Method > Measures section describes child adjustment using child, parent and teacher reports, including available mother and father reports. It measures parenting skills through coded observations of parent–child interactions, not mother, father or child reports, and does not describe parent mindfulness as a measured outcome. The citation therefore supports the multiple-respondent claim for child adjustment, but not all the outcomes listed. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Gewirtz 2018, an intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken.

    “An intent-totreat analysis was undertaken, but the methods used to do this were not reported in the study.”

    From Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents (2024) · cites this paper as Gewirtz 2018

    The Effectiveness Hypotheses section identifies intent-to-treat analyses, and Results > Hypothesis 1 reports an ADAPT ITT contrast. The sentence’s further assertion that the methods were not reported is not supported: Method > Measures describes the missing-data approach (FIML), and the Results describe the ITT contrast in the effectiveness model. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Epstein MH Cullinan D Ryser G Pearson N 2002 Development of a Scale to Assess Emotional Disturbance Behavioral Disorders 28 5 22
  2. Reynolds CR Kamphaus RW 2004 Behavior assessment scale for children Bloomington, MN Pearson Assessments

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gewirtz, A. H., DeGarmo, D. S., & Zamir, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Gewirtz, Abigail H.
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2017-09-15
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
589-599
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2754746759
Cited by
97
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 DA 030114; 2010-2015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
Keywords
military families, parental deployment, parent training, behavioral parent training, child adjustment, school-aged children, indirect effects, Iraq and Afghanistan wars, online intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Program Evaluation, Parenting, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Young Adult, Military Family

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review