Cited by 27Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Addressing Maternal Depression, Substance Use, and Intimate Partner Violence in Home Visiting: a Quasi-Experimental Pilot Test of a Screen-and-Refer Approach

Open access
Dauber, Sarah, Hogue, Aaron, Henderson, Craig E., Nugent, Jessica, Hernandez, Gina·2019·Prevention Science

Abstract

This quasi-experimental pilot study describes preliminary impacts of the "Home Visitation Enhancing Linkages Project (HELP)," a pragmatic screen-and-refer approach for promoting identification of and linkage to treatment for maternal depression (MD), substance use (SU), and intimate partner violence (IPV) within early childhood home visiting. HELP includes screening for MD, SU, and IPV followed by a menu of motivational interviewing and case management interventions aimed at linking clients to treatment, designed for delivery within routine home visiting. HELP was piloted within four counties of a statewide home visiting system that were implementing Healthy Families America. HELP clients (N = 394) were compared to clients in five demographically matched counties that received usual Healthy Families services (N = 771) on whether their home visitors (1) identified MD, SU, and IPV risk; (2) discussed MD, SU, and IPV during home visits; and (3) made referrals for MD, SU, and IPV. All data were extracted from the program's management information system. A significant impact of HELP was found on discussion of risk in home visits for all three risk domains with large effect sizes (MD OR = 4.08; SU OR = 15.94; IPV OR = 9.35). HELP had no impact on risk identification and minimal impact on referral. Findings provide preliminary support for HELP as a way of improving discussion of client behavioral health risks during home visits, an important first step toward better meeting these needs within home visiting. However, more intensive intervention is likely needed to impact risk identification and referral outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-019-01045-x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is literature to support the potential efficacy of home visiting programs for pregnant and parenting individuals misusing substances.

    “There is also literature to support the potential efficacy of home visiting programs for pregnant and parenting individuals misusing substances (Barlow et al., 2015; Dauber et al., 2019)”

    From Home‐based family recovery supports: Feasibility, acceptability, and adoption of training home visitors in “Mothering from the Inside Out” (2025) · cites this paper as Dauber et al., 2019

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that the HELP home-visiting approach increased discussions of substance use with clients, which offers limited support for its potential. It also reports no impact on risk identification and minimal impact on referrals. The paper does not establish that home visiting improves outcomes for pregnant or parenting individuals misusing substances. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Muthen L, & Muthen B (1998–2017). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dauber, S., Hogue, A., Henderson, C. E., Nugent, J., & Hernandez, G.
Affiliations
  • Sam Houston State University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Dauber, Sarah
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2019-08-20
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
1233-1243
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2969876078
Cited by
27
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (1R21DA034108)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
maternal depression, substance use, intimate partner violence, home visiting, Healthy Families America, motivational interviewing, case management, referral to treatment, early childhood, behavioral health screening, risk identification
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adult, Community Health Nursing, Female, House Calls, Humans, Maternal Welfare, Pilot Projects, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Professional-Family Relations, Program Evaluation, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review