Cited by 57Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily and Disability Support Research

Outcomes of a Randomized Trial of a Cognitive Behavioral Enhancement to Address Maternal Distress in Home Visited Mothers

Open access
McFarlane, Elizabeth, Burrell, Lori, Duggan, Anne, Tandon, Darius·2017·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

Objectives To assess the effectiveness of a 6-week, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) group-based enhancement to home visiting to address stress and prevent depression as compared with home visiting as usual in low income mothers of young children. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial with 95 low-income mothers of young children to assess the effectiveness of a 6-week, cognitive behavioral group-based enhancement to Healthy Families America and Parents as Teachers home visiting (HV/CBT = 49) to address stress and prevent depression as compared with home visiting as usual (HV = 46). Booster sessions for the HV/CBT group were offered at 3 and 6 months. Participants completed measures of coping, stress and depression at three points: baseline prior to randomization, post-intervention, and 6 months post-intervention. Parent child interaction was also measured at 6 months. Results Intent-to-treat analyses found improved coping and reduced stress and depression post-intervention. While impacts on these outcomes were attenuated at 6 months, positive impacts were observed for selected aspects of mothers' interactions with their children. Maternal characteristics at baseline were associated with participation in the intervention and with post-intervention and 6-month outcomes. Mothers with lower levels of stress and those with fewer children were more likely to attend intervention sessions. Mothers with lower levels of stress had more favorable post intervention outcomes. Conclusions CBT group-based enhancement to home visiting improved maternal coping, reduced stress and depression immediately post intervention but not at 6 months, suggesting more work is needed to sustain positive gains in low-income mothers of young children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-016-2125-7

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MB has been shown to reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms and prevent new cases of perinatal depression.

    “MB has been shown to reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms and prevent new cases of perinatal depression (Le et al. 2011; McFarlane et al. 2017; Muñoz et al. 2007; Tandon et al. 2014, 2021, 2022).”

    From Effects of a Personalized Stress Management Intervention on Maternal Mental Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial. (2025) · cites this paper as McFarlane et al. 2017

    The Results (Overall Post-intervention and 6 Month Maternal Psychosocial Outcomes; page not provided) report lower depression scores for the MB group immediately after the intervention, but no significant psychosocial differences at six months. The paper does not report a reduction in anxiety symptoms or measure whether MB prevented new cases of perinatal depression. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McFarlane, E., Burrell, L., Duggan, A., & Tandon, D.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
McFarlane, Elizabeth
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2016-08-17
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
475-484
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W2514669907
Cited by
57
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • O'Neill Foundation
  • Administration for Children and Families (90CA1778)
  • Health Resources and Services Administration (X02MC23128)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, home visiting, maternal distress, maternal stress, coping, low-income mothers, young children, Healthy Families America, parents as teachers, booster sessions, parent-child interaction, intervention sustainability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depression, Female, House Calls, Humans, Infant, Mothers, Parent-Child Relations, Postnatal Care, Poverty, Psychometrics, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review