Cited by 32Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchForgiveness and Related BehaviorsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The Relationship Between Forgiveness, Spirituality, Traumatic Guilt and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Among People with Addiction

Langman, Louise, Chung, Man Cheung·2013·Psychiatric Quarterly

Abstract

Spirituality and forgiveness have been shown to be associated with psychological well-being, while guilt has been associated with poor health. Little is known, however, about the relationship between forgiveness, spirituality, guilt, posttraumatic stress (PTSD) and psychological co-morbidity among people in recovery from addiction. Eighty-one people (F = 36, M = 45) in recovery from drug and alcohol addiction were recruited from two residential units and two drop-in centres in a city in the United Kingdom. They completed the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS), the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28), the Spiritual Involvement and Beliefs Scale (SIBS), the Heartland Forgiveness Scale (HFS), the Traumatic Guilt Inventory (TGI), the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST-22) and the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-20). The control group comprised of 83 (F = 34, M = 49) individuals who confirmed that they did not have addiction and completed the PDS & GHQ-28. 54 % of the addiction group met the criteria for full PTSD and reported anxiety, somatic problems and depression. They described themselves as spiritual, had strong feelings of guilt associated with their addiction, and had difficulty in forgiving themselves. Controlling for demographics, number of events and medication management, regression analyses showed that spirituality predicted psychological co-morbidity, whilst feelings of guilt predicted PTSD symptoms and psychological co-morbidity. Unexpectedly, fo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11126-012-9223-5

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langman, L., & Chung, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • Zayed University (AE)
Corresponding author
Chung, Man Cheung
Venue
Psychiatric Quarterly
Published
2012-05-15
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
11-26
ISSN
  • 0033-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6709
OpenAlex
W2070026570
Cited by
32
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
forgiveness, spirituality, post-traumatic stress disorder, addiction recovery, drug addiction, alcoholism, psychological comorbidity, self-forgiveness, trauma, residential addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, United Kingdom, Guilt, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Comorbidity, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders, Spirituality, Young Adult, Forgiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review