Cited by 46Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaCOVID-19 and Mental Health

PTSD’s Underlying Dimensions in Typhoon Haiyan Survivors: Assessing DSM-5 Symptomatology-Based PTSD Models and Their Relation to Posttraumatic Cognition

Mordeno, Imelu G., Carpio, Jennifer Gay E., Nalipay, Ma. Jenina N., Saavedra, Rhea Lina J.·2017·Psychiatric Quarterly

Abstract

The recent changes in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) call for a re-examination of PTSD's latent factor structure. The present study assessed six competing models of PTSD based on DSM-5 symptomatology using confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of young adult Filipino survivors of typhoon Haiyan, one of the strongest typhoons in the world ever recorded at the time of its landfall (N = 632). Furthermore, the differential relationships of the factors of the best-fitting model with posttraumatic cognitions were also investigated. Results showed the 7-factor hybrid model of PTSD comprised of intrusion, avoidance, negative affect, anhedonia, externalizing behaviors, anxious arousal, and dysphoric arousal, to be the best fitting model. In addition, the varying degrees of relationship with posttraumatic cognitions support the distinctiveness of each factor. These findings are pertinent in light of the changes in DSM-5 PTSD symptomatology, as well as in understanding the underlying dimensions of PTSD among Asian, particularly Filipino, survivors of a natural disaster.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11126-016-9429-z

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Active avoidance symptoms were found to be related to negative cognitions of the world, whereas reexperiencing was related to negative cognitions of the self.

    “Indeed, active avoidance symptoms were found to be related to negative cognitions of the world, whereas reexperiencing was related to negative cognitions of the self (Mordeno et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mordeno, I. G., Carpio, J. G. E., Nalipay, M. J. N., & Saavedra, R. L. J.
Affiliations
  • Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology (PH)
  • De La Salle University (PH)
  • Leyte Normal University (PH)
Corresponding author
Nalipay, Ma. Jenina N.
Venue
Psychiatric Quarterly
Published
2016-02-26
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
9-23
ISSN
  • 0033-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6709
OpenAlex
W2337985392
Cited by
46
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, Typhoon Haiyan, natural disaster survivors, latent factor structure, intrusion, avoidance, negative affect, anhedonia, externalizing problems, anxious arousal, dysphoric arousal
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Anxiety, Arousal, Avoidance Learning, Cognition, Disasters, Dreams, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Philippines, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Survivors, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult, Cyclonic Storms, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review