Cited by 241Digital Mental Health InterventionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in psychiatry

Open access
Pham, Kay T., Nabizadeh, Amir, Selek, Salih·2022·Psychiatric Quarterly

Abstract

The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in psychiatry has risen over the past several years to meet the growing need for improved access to mental health solutions. Additionally, shortages of mental health providers during the COVID-19 pandemic have continued to exacerbate the burden of mental illness worldwide. AI applications already in existence include those enabled to assist with psychiatric diagnoses, symptom tracking, disease course prediction, and psychoeducation. Modalities of AI mental health care delivery include availability through the internet, smartphone applications, and digital gaming. Here we review emerging AI-based interventions in the form of chat and therapy bots, specifically conversational applications that teach the user emotional coping mechanisms and provide support for people with communication difficulties, computer generated images of faces that form the basis of avatar therapy, and intelligent animal-like robots with new advances in digital psychiatry. We discuss the implications of incorporating AI chatbots into clinical practice and offer perspectives on how these AI-based interventions will further impact the field of psychiatry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11126-022-09973-8

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is initial evidence that chatbots may be effective in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms, as well as stress.

    “There is initial evidence that such chatbots may be effective in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms, as well as stress [33-36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pham, K. T., Nabizadeh, A., & Selek, S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Pham, Kay T.
Venue
Psychiatric Quarterly
Published
2022-02-25
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
249-253
ISSN
  • 0033-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6709
OpenAlex
W4214606152
Cited by
241
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 11
FWCI
44.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
artificial intelligence in psychiatry, chatbots, digital mental health, AVATAR therapy, emotion regulation, symptom monitoring, psychiatric diagnosis, psychoeducation, access to mental health care, mental health workforce shortage, COVID-19 pandemic, clinical implementation of AI
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Mental Health, Psychiatry, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review