Cited by 6Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Spanish Version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS): Validity, Reliability and Measurement Invariance Across Gender in a Sample of Young Adults

Sisí, Conchita, Pallesen, Ståle, Fernández-Martín, Mª Poveda·2025·Psychiatric Quarterly

Abstract

Problematic social media use (PSMU) has become a significant focus of research, particularly among young adults, due to its association with behavioral addiction and its potential effects on well-being. The Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS) is a widely recognized tool for assessing PSMU. This study sought to adapt the BSMAS to Spanish and evaluate its psychometric properties in a sample of Spanish young adults.Results demonstrated that the Spanish BSMAS shows adequate reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85) and suggests a one-dimensional structure of problematic social media use (χ 2 (9) = 78.2, CFI = 0.91, TLI = 0.85, RMSEA = 0.07, NFI = 0.90). Measurement invariance testing suggests the scale may be applicable across genders, establishing configural, metric, and scalar invariance, with minimal residual differences noted. Concurrent validity was further explored through correlations with external measures: BSMAS scores showed a moderate positive correlation with the Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) scale (r = .50 to .70) and a significant negative correlation with the Life Satisfaction Scale (SWLS) (r = -.40 to -.60). Multiple regression analysis explained 61.7% of the variance in PSMU (adjusted R 2 = 0.606). Age (p = 0.01), FOMO State (p < 0.001), FOMO Trait (p < 0.001), and Satisfaction with Life (p = 0.01) emerged as significant predictors. Gender (p = 0.52) and relationship status, being in a relationship (p = 0.47) or single (p = 0.13), were not significant. Educational variables showed that being currently enrolled in studies (p = 0.001) and studying for a Doctorate (p = 0.04) significantly predicted PSMU, while being in Middle School (p = 0.77) or at University (p = 0.08) did not.These findings indicate that the Spanish BSMAS may be a reliable instrument for measuring PSMU in Spanish young adults, providing a tool for future research and practical applications in this population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11126-025-10188-w

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Akbari M, Seydavi M, Palmieri S, Mansueto G, Caselli G, Spada MM. Fear of missing out (FoMO) and internet use: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Addict. 2021;10(4):879–900. · DOI
  2. Andreassen CS, Billieux J, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Demetrovics Z, Mazzoni E, Pallesen S. The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychol Addict Behav. 2016;30(2):252. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Andreassen CS, Torbjørn T, Brunborg GS, Pallesen S. Development of a facebook addiction scale. Psychol Rep. 2012;110(2):501–17. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Arrivillaga C, Griffiths MD, Rey L, Extremera N. Validation of the Spanish version of the Bergen social media addiction scale (BSMAS) among Spanish adolescents. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(40):31582–91. · DOI
  5. Bailey ER, Matz SC, Youyou W, Iyengar SS. Authentic self-expression on social media is associated with greater subjective well-being. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1–9. · DOI
  6. Bartlett MS. The statistical conception of mental factors. Br J Psychol. 1937;28(1):97.
  7. Bataineh BS, Hébert ET, Loukas A, Harrell MB, Yang Q, Murthy D, Schwartz S, Jung S, Wilkinson AV. Problematic social media use and vaping among Mexican-American college students. Digit Health. 2024;10:20552076241283250. · DOI
  8. Bottaro R, Griffiths MD, Faraci P. Meta-analysis of reliability and validity of the Bergen social media addiction scale (BSMAS). Int J Ment Health Addict. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-025-01461-x. · DOI
  9. Brailovskaia J, Margraf J. What does media use reveal about personality and mental health? An exploratory investigation among German students. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191810. · DOI
  10. Brailovskaia J, Teismann T. Addictive social media use and mental health: the mediating role of sleep quality. J Affect Disord. 2021;278:416–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.078. · DOI
  11. Casale S, Akbari M, Seydavi M, Benucci SB, Fioravanti G. Has the prevalence of problematic social media use increased over the past six years and since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic? A meta-analysis of the studies published since the development of the Bergen social media addiction scale. Addict Behav. 2023;147: 107838. · DOI
  12. Cerniglia L, Zoratto F, Cimino S, Laviola G, Ammaniti M, Adriani W. Internet addiction in adolescence: neurobiological, psychosocial, and clinical issues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;76:174–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.024. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2002;9(2):233–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14(3):464–504. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cohen J. Set correlation and contingency tables. Appl Psychol Meas. 1988;12(4):425–434. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Copez-Lonzoy A, Vallejos-Flores M, Capa-Luque W, Salas-Blas E, Doig AMM, Dias PC, Bazo-Alvarez JC. Adaptation of the Bergen social media addiction scale (BSMAS) in Spanish. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2023;241:104072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.104072. · DOI
  17. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–5. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Dufour M, Brunelle N, Tremblay J, Leclerc D, Cousineau MM, Khazaal Y, ..., Berbiche D. Gender difference in internet use and internet problems among Quebec high school students. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(10):663–668. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Duradoni M, Innocenti F, Guazzini A. Well-being and social media: a systematic review of Bergen addiction scales. Future Internet. 2020;12(2): 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12020024. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Griffiths MD. Behavioral addictions: criteria, evidence, and treatment. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016;18(12):86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0727-8. · DOI
  21. Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–36. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lin CY, Broström A, Nilsen P, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. Psychometric validation of the Persian Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale using classic test theory and Rasch models. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(4):620–629. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lin CY, Ganji M, Pontes HM, Imani V, Broström A, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. Psychometric evaluation of the persian internet disorder scale among adolescents. J Behav Addict. 2018;7(3):665–75. · DOI
  24. Luo T, Qin L, Cheng L, Wang S, Zhu Z, Xu J, Chen H, Liu Q, Hu M, Tong J, Hao W, Wei B, Liao Y. Determination the cut-off point for the Bergen social media addiction (BSMAS): diagnostic contribution of the six criteria of the components model of addiction for social media disorder. J Behav Addict. 2021;10(2):281–90. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Bouter LM, Vet HC, Terwee CB. The COnsensusbased Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(2):105–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143. · DOI
  26. Moura DF, Moura HDS, Filgueiras GDMR, Freire SEDA, Negreiros F, Medeiros EDD. Fear of missing out (FoMO), mídias sociais e ansiedade: uma revisão sistemática. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad. 2021;11(3):99–114.
  27. Przybylski AK, Murayama K, DeHaan CR, Gladwell V. Fear of missing out scale. Comput Hum Behav. 2013. · DOI
  28. Putnick DL, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev. 2016;41:71–90. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rao BN, Kalyani V. A study on positive and negative effects of social media on society. J SciTechnol (JST). 2022;7(10):46–54.
  30. Ruckwongpatr K, Paratthakonkun C, Sangtongdee U, Pramukti I, Nurmala I, Angkasith K, Lin CY. Validity, reliability, and measurement invariance of the Thai smartphone application-based addiction scale (SABAS) and Bergen social media addiction scale (BSMAS). Int J Ment Health Promot. 2024;26(4):293–302. · DOI
  31. Sim PP, Prihadi K. Social comparison and life satisfaction in social media: the role of mattering and state self-esteem. Int J Public Health Sci. 2020;9(3):245–54. · DOI
  32. Soraci P, Demetrovics Z, Bevan N, Pisanti R, Servidio R, Di Bernardo C, …, Griffiths MD. FoMO and psychological distress mediate the relationship between life satisfaction, problematic smartphone use, and problematic social media use. Int J Mental Health Addict. 2025; 1–30. · DOI
  33. Tifferet S. Gender differences in privacy tendencies on social network sites: a meta-analysis. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;93:1–12. · DOI
  34. Toma C, Hancock J, Ellison N. The impact of social media on interpersonal communication and relationships. Annu Rev Psychol. 2020;71:607–30. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081519-035831. · DOI
  35. Tutal Ö, Erensoy H, Luş M. Relationship between psychological symptoms, impulsivity, and social media use problems. Bağımlılık Dergisi. 2021;22(1):43–52. https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.793837. · DOI
  36. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2000;3(1):4–70. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Vannucci A, Flannery KM, Ohannessian CM. Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. J Affect Disord. 2020;275:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.117. · DOI
  38. Vázquez C, Duque A, Hervás G. Satisfaction with life scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: validation and normative data. Span J Psychol. 2013;16: E82. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.82. · DOI
  39. Wegmann E, Schiebener J, Brand M. Social-networks use as adaptive or maladaptive strategy for coping with stress. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):11895. · DOI
  40. Yue H, Zhang X, Cheng X, Liu B, Bao H. Measurement invariance of the Bergen social media addiction scale across genders. Front Psychol. 2022;13:879259. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sisí, C., Pallesen, S., & Fernández-Martín, M. P.
Affiliations
  • HM Hospitales (ES)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Sisí, Conchita
Venue
Psychiatric Quarterly
Published
2025-07-28
ISSN
  • 0033-2720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6709
OpenAlex
W4412726918
Cited by
6
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, social media addiction, Spanish adaptation, measurement invariance, gender differences, young adults, fear of missing out, life satisfaction, behavioral addiction, psychometric validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review