Cited by 51Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

A quantum walk-assisted approximate algorithm for bounded NP optimisation problems

Open access
Marsh, S., Wang, J. B.·2019·Quantum Information Processing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11128-019-2171-3

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ansatz adaptations can occur as a byproduct, as in the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz where the primary goal is to find a mixing Hamiltonian that ensures staying in the feasible subspace.

    “Besides the mentioned ansatz search, as the driving force behind ansatz adaptation, there is also the possibility of having these adaptations as a byproduct, like it happens, e.g., within the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz where the primary goal is to find a mixing Hamiltonian that ensures to stay in the feasible subspace [11, 58, 95, 112, 116, 117, 120, 127].”
  • To mitigate drawbacks of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz, a quantum walk-assisted approach, a dynamic update of the ansatz, and constraint-encoding schemes for QAOA have been proposed.

    “To mitigate these drawbacks, a quantum walk-assisted approach has been suggested [95], a dynamic update of the ansatz based on the quantum outputs has been proposed [120], and constraint-encoding schemes for QAOA have been classified [117] into linear equality, linear inequality, and arbitrary constraints.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]P. W. Shor, SIAM Journal on Computing 26 , 1484 (1997).
  2. [2]A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, E. Deotto, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, and D. A. Spielman, in STOC (ACM, 2003) p. 59.
  3. [3]L. K. Grover, in STOC (ACM, 1996) p. 212.
  4. [4]V. Kann, in Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (Springer, 1995) p. 227.
  5. [6]V. Kann, in Automata, Languages and Programming (Springer, 1993) p. 52.
  6. [7]E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, arXiv (2014), 1411.4028 [quant-ph].
  7. [8]E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser, arXiv (2000), quant-ph/0001106. · arXiv
  8. [9]E. Farhi and S. Gutmann, Physical Review A 58 , 915 (1998).
  9. [14]S. Xu, X. Sun, J. Wu, W.-W. Zhang, N. Arshed, and B. C. Sanders, New Journal of Physics (in press) (2018).
  10. [16]Z.-J. Li and J. B. Wang, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 48 , 355301 (2015).
  11. [21]G. Lancia, V. Bafna, S. Istrail, R. Lippert, and R. Schwartz, in Computers and Games (Springer, 2001) p. 182.
  12. [22]R. O'Callahan and J. D. Choi, ACM SIGPLAN Notices 38 , 167 (2003).
  13. [26]S. Hadfield, Z. Wang, B. O'Gorman, E. G. Rieffel, D. Venturelli, and R. Biswas, arXiv (2017), 1709.03489 [quant-ph].
  14. [28]R. Sharma, M. Gupta, and G. Kapoor, Journal of Mathematical Inequalities 4 , 355 (2010).
  15. [29]J. Welch, D. Greenbaum, S. Mostame, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, New Journal of Physics 16 (2014).
  16. [30]A. M. Childs, Quantum information processing in continuous time , Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2004).
  17. [31]D. Aharonov and A. Ta-Shma, in STOC (ACM, 2003) p. 20.
  18. [32]J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, The Computer Journal 7 , 308 (1965).
  19. [34]Hartmanis, Juris, SIAM Review 24 , 90 (1982).
  20. [35]G. Karakostas, ACM Trans. Algorithms 5 , 41 (2009).
  21. [36]L. Babai, arXiv (2015), 1512.03547 [cs.DS].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsh, S., & Wang, J. B.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Wang, J. B.
Venue
Quantum Information Processing
Published
2019-01-16
Volume
18
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1570-0755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1332
OpenAlex
W2798553955
Cited by
50
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum Information Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Keywords
quantum approximate optimization algorithm, quantum walks, minimum vertex cover, constrained optimization, phase shift, quantum circuit synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review