Cited by 48Seed and Plant BiochemistryNatural Products and Biological ResearchFood Science and Nutritional Studies

Physiological Effects Associated with Quinoa Consumption and Implications for Research Involving Humans: a Review

Simnadis, Thomas George, Tapsell, Linda C., Beck, Eleanor J.·2015·Plant Foods for Human Nutrition

Abstract

Quinoa is a pseudo-grain consumed as a dietary staple in South America. In recent years, consumer demand for quinoa in the developed world has grown steadily. Its perceived health benefits have been cited as a driving force behind this trend, but there are very few human studies investigating the impact of quinoa consumption. The aim of this review was to identify physiological effects of quinoa consumption with potential for human health. A critical evaluation of animal model studies was conducted. The quality of identified studies was assessed using a methodological quality assessment tool and summative conclusions were drawn to guide the direction of future human research. The majority of studies were of fair quality. Purported physiological effects of quinoa consumption included decreased weight gain, improved lipid profile and improved capacity to respond to oxidative stress. These physiological effects were attributed to the presence of saponins, protein and 20-hydroxyecdysone in the quinoa seed. The implications of these findings are that human studies should investigate the impact of quinoa consumption on weight gain and lipid levels. The role of quinoa as an antioxidant is still unclear and requires further elucidation in animal models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11130-015-0506-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simnadis, T. G., Tapsell, L. C., & Beck, E. J.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Simnadis, Thomas George
Venue
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
Published
2015-08-07
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
238-249
ISSN
  • 0033-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 0921-9668
  • 1573-9104
OpenAlex
W1800838835
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Grains Research and Development Corporation
  • Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Natural Products and Biological Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food Science and Nutritional Studies
Keywords
quinoa, saponins, 20-hydroxyecdysone, weight gain, lipid profile, oxidative stress, antioxidant activity, quinoa protein, human health effects
MeSH terms
Animals, Antioxidants, Edible Grain, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Ecdysterone, Humans, Plant Extracts, Plant Proteins, Saponins, Weight Gain, Oxidative Stress, Chenopodium quinoa, Lipid Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review