Cited by 127Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationChronic Disease Management Strategies

Use of the SF-8 to assess health-related quality of life for a chronically ill, low-income population participating in the Central Louisiana Medication Access Program (CMAP)

Lefante, John J., Harmon, Gary N., Ashby, Keith M., Barnard, David, Webber, Larry S.·2005·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Objectives The utility of the SF-8 for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQL) is demonstrated. Race and gender differences in physical component (PCS) and mental component (MCS) summary scores among participants in the CENLA Medication Access Program (CMAP), along with comparisons to the United States population are made.Methods Age-adjusted multiple linear regression analyses were used to compare 1687 CMAP participants to the US population. Internal race and gender comparisons, adjusting for age and the number of self reported diagnoses, were also obtained. The paired t-test was used to assess 6-month change in PCS and MCS scores for a subset of 342 participants.Results CMAP participants have PCS and MCS scores that are significantly 10-12 points lower than the US population, indicating lower self-reported HRQL. Females have significantly higher PCS and significantly lower MCS than males. African-Americans have significantly higher MCS than Caucasians. Significant increases in both PCS and MCS were observed for the subset of participants after 6 months of intervention.Conclusions The expected lower baseline PCS and MCS measures and the expected associations with age and number of diagnoses indicate that the SF-8 survey is an effective tool for measuring the HRQL of participants in this program. Preliminary results indicate significant increases in both PCS and MCS 6 months after intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-004-0784-0

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lefante, J. J., Harmon, G. N., Ashby, K. M., Barnard, D., & Webber, L. S.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Lefante, John J.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2005-04
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
665-673
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2129685405
Cited by
127
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
SF-8, health-related quality of life, chronic disease, low-income populations, racial differences, gender differences, physical component summary, mental component summary, health disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Ethnicity, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Louisiana, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Quality of Life, Linear Models, Sex Distribution, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review