Cited by 249Cardiac Health and Mental HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: short form 36 scores compared with a normal population

Open access
Brown, N, Melville, M, Gray, D, Young, T, Munro, J, Skene, A M, Hampton, J R·1999·Heart

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of myocardial infarction on quality of life in four year survivors compared to data from “community norms”, and to determine factors associated with a poor quality of life. DESIGN: Cohort study based on the Nottingham heart attack register. SETTING: Two district general hospitals serving a defined urban/rural population. SUBJECTS: All patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction during 1992 and alive at a median of four years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short form 36 (SF 36) domain and overall scores. RESULTS: Of 900 patients with an acute myocardial infarction in 1992, there were 476 patients alive and capable of responding to a questionnaire in 1997. The response rate was 424 (89.1%). Compared to age and sex adjusted normative data, patients aged under 65 years exhibited impairment in all eight domains, the largest differences being in physical functioning (mean difference 20 points), role physical (mean difference 23 points), and general health (mean difference 19 points). In patients over 65 years mean domain scores were similar to community norms. Multiple regression analysis revealed that impaired quality of life was closely associated with inability to return to work through ill health, a need for coronary revascularisation, the use of anxiolytics, hypnotics or inhalers, the need for two or more angina drugs, a frequency of chest pain one or more times per week, and a Rose dyspnoea score of ⩾ 2. CONCLUSIONS: The SF 36 provides valuable additional information for the practising clinician. Compared to community norms the greatest impact on quality of life is seen in patients of working age. Impaired quality of life was reported by patients unfit for work, those with angina and dyspnoea, patients with coexistent lung disease, and those with anxiety and sleep disturbances. Improving quality of life after myocardial infarction remains a challenge for physicians.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/hrt.81.4.352

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Murdoch DL, Lawrence A, Henderson E, et al. Quality of life in chronic stable angina. Eur Heart J 1996;17:240.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, N., Melville, M., Gray, D., Young, T., Munro, J., Skene, A. M., & Hampton, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, N
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-04-01
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
352-358
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2099958917
Cited by
249
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
acute myocardial infarction, quality of life, SF-36, community norms, long-term outcomes, physical function, return to work, coronary revascularization, angina pectoris, dyspnea, anxiety, sleep disorders, lung disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Angina Pectoris, Anxiety, Chest Pain, Dyspnea, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lung Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Sleep Wake Disorders, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review