The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137 · cited 1×
“Recent policy in both the US and UK has emphasised the importance of patient self management and patient involvement in care [23] based on the notions of patientcentred care [24, 25] and shared decision making [26].”
BackgroundFramework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
Campbell, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694 · Cited by 3,474 · cited 1×
“First, the intervention itself is complex [3].”
Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., & Selby, P. J. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.06.078 · Cited by 1,382
Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D. V., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.23.3027 · Cited by 1,011
Gilbody, S., Whitty, P., Grimshaw, J., & Thomas, R. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3145 · Cited by 749
Impact of patient‐reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review
Marshall, S., Haywood, K., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00650.x · Cited by 602 · cited 6×
“Much of the literature on the use of PROs in clinical practice has focussed on their use as a screening tool [2, 8, 9].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialWhy We Don’t Come: Patient Perceptions on No-Shows
Lacy, N. L. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.123 · Cited by 390 · cited 1×
“Increased collaboration between clinicians and their patients may also address some of the barriers to patient’s appropriate use of primary care [31] or uptake of preventative health services [32].”
BackgroundMagruder-Habib, K., Zung, W. W. K., & Feussner, J. R. (1990) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199003000-00004 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., Hess, R., Miller, D. M., Reeve, B. B., & Santana, M. (2012) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x · Cited by 910
Self-citationPhase III Randomized Controlled Trial of eRAPID: eHealth Intervention During Chemotherapy
Absolom, K., Warrington, L., Hudson, E., Hewison, J., Morris, C., Holch, P., Carter, R., Gibson, A., Holmes, M., Clayton, B., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.20.02015 · Cited by 311
Baylor, C., Yorkston, K., Eadie, T., Kim, J., Chung, H., & Amtmann, D. (2013) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0140 · Cited by 286
Advances in Patient Reported Outcomes: The NIH PROMIS Measures
Broderick, J., DeWit, E. M., Rothrock, N., Crane, P., & Forrest, C. B. (2013) · eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes) · doi:10.13063/2327-9214.1015 · Cited by 244
Campbell, R., Ju, A., King, M. T., & Rutherford, C. (2022) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-021-03003-z · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenhalgh, J.
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2008-12-23
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-123
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W1972803103
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 18.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11136-008-9430-6
- The paper
- Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9430-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
