Cited by 62Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Cross-cultural validity of the thyroid-specific quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measure, ThyPRO

Watt, Torquil, Barbesino, Giuseppe, Bjorner, Jakob Bue, Bonnema, Steen Joop, Bukvic, Branka, Drummond, Russell, Groenvold, Mogens, Hegedüs, Laszlo +15 more·2015·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Background and purpose Thyroid diseases are common and often affect quality of life (QoL). No cross-culturally validated patient-reported outcome measuring thyroid-related QoL is available. The purpose of the present study was to test the cross-cultural validity of the newly developed thyroid-related patient-reported outcome ThyPRO, using tests for differential item functioning (DIF) according to language version.Methods The ThyPRO consists of 85 items summarized in 13 multi-item scales and one single item. Scales cover physical and mental symptoms, well-being and function as well as social and daily function and cosmetic concerns. Translation applied standard forward-backward methodology with subsequent cognitive interviews and reviews. Responses (N = 1,810) to the ThyPRO were collected in seven countries: UK (n = 166), The Netherlands (n = 147), Serbia (n = 150), Italy (n = 110), India (n = 148), Denmark (n = 902) and Sweden (n = 187). Translated versions were compared pairwise to the English version by examining uniform and nonuniform DIF, i.e., whether patients from different countries respond differently to a particular item, although they have identical level of the concept measured by the item. Analyses were controlled for thyroid diagnosis. DIF was investigated by ordinal logistic regression, testing for both statistical significance and magnitude (ΔR (2) > 0.02). Scale level was estimated by the sum score, after purification.Results For twelve of the 84 tested items, DIF was identified in more than one language. Eight of these were small, but four were indicative of possible low translatability. Twenty-one instances of DIF in single languages were identified, indicating potential problems with the particular translation. However, only seven were of a magnitude which could affect scale scores, most of which could be explained by sample differences not controlled for.Conclusion The ThyPRO has good cross-cultural validity with only minor cross-cultural invariance and is recommended for use in international multicenter studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-014-0798-1

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watt, T., Barbesino, G., Bjorner, J. B., Bonnema, S. J., Bukvic, B., Drummond, R., Groenvold, M., Hegedüs, L., Kantzer, V., Lasch, K. E., Marcocci, C., Mishra, A., Netea-Maier, R., Ekker, M., Paunovic, I., Quinn, T. J., Rasmussen, Å. K., Russell, A., Sabaretnam, M., Smit, J., Törring, O., Zivaljevic, V., & Feldt-Rasmussen, U.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Pharmerit (Netherlands) (NL)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Univerzitetski Klinički Centar Srbije (RS)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Watt, Torquil
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2014-09-07
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
769-780
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2088500908
Cited by
62
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF15OC0014622)
  • Science and Engineering Research Board
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
thyroid dysfunction, quality of life, patient-reported outcome measures, cross-cultural validity, differential item functioning, cross-cultural invariance, translation, cross-cultural adaptation, cognitive interviewing, international multicenter study
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Denmark, Female, Humans, India, Italy, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Thyroid Diseases, Translations, Logistic Models, Serbia, Self Report, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review