The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accounting conservatism and corporate governance
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x · Cited by 16,243
Corporate Governance and Equity Prices
Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530360535162 · Cited by 6,120
Cited by
Disclosure theories and disclosure measures
Urquiza, F. B., Navarro, M. C. A., Trombetta, M., & Lara, J. M. G. (2010) · Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad · doi:10.1080/02102412.2010.10779686 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- García Lara, J. M., García Osma, B., & Penalva, F.
- Venue
- Review of Accounting Studies
- Published
- 2007-11-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-201
- ISSN
- 1380-6653 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7136
- OpenAlex
- W2015538552
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 51.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accounting conservatism and corporate governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11142-007-9060-1
- The paper
- García Lara, J. M., García Osma, B., & Penalva, F. (2009). Accounting conservatism and corporate governance. Review of Accounting Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-007-9060-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
