The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of Working Memory Capacity to Children’s Reading Comprehension: A Longitudinal Investigation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
Stanovich, K. E. (1986) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.21.4.1 · Cited by 5,222
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies
Carroll, J. B. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571312 · Cited by 4,121
Decoding, reading, and reading disability.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193258600700104 · Cited by 3,972
Human cognitive abilities a survey of factor-analytic studies
Carroll, J. B. (2004) · Cited by 3,394
Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309 · Cited by 3,078
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf00401799 · Cited by 2,956
(1980) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,935
Cairns, H. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996) · Language · doi:10.2307/416113 · Cited by 1,920
Cited by
The Precursors of Reading Ability in Young Readers: Evidence From a Four-Year Longitudinal Study
Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.529219 · Cited by 630
Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: a longitudinal study
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2008) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1414 · Cited by 554
The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6 · Cited by 406
Kim, Y.-S. G. (2017) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643 · Cited by 393
Lervåg, A., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12861 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M.-F.
- Venue
- Reading and Writing
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7-9
- Pages
- 617-656
- ISSN
- 0922-4777 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0905
- OpenAlex
- W2027120374
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of Working Memory Capacity to Children’s Reading Comprehension: A Longitudinal Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
- The paper
- Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M.-F. (2005). Contribution of Working Memory Capacity to Children’s Reading Comprehension: A Longitudinal Investigation. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
