The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Decoding, reading, and reading disability.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193258600700104 · Cited by 3,972
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf00401799 · Cited by 2,956
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 · Cited by 2,871
Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & collaboration with COST Action A8 network (2003) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712603321661859 · Cited by 2,601
Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x · Cited by 2,555
Learning to Read Words: Theory, Findings, and Issues
Ehri, L. C. (2005) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4 · Cited by 1,411
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665 · Cited by 1,084
Share, D. L. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584 · Cited by 1,022
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- * Dryer, L. G., & Katz, L. (1992). An examination of ‘the simple view of reading’. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 41, 169–175.
- Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
- RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Washington, DC: RAND.
- * Sears, S., & Keogh, B. (1993). Predicting reading performance using the Slingerland Procedures. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 78–89. · doi:10.1007/bf02928175
- * Spooner, A., Baddeley, A., & Gathercole, S. (2004). Can reading accuracy and comprehension be separated in the Nale Analysis of Reading Ability? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 187–204. · doi:10.1348/000709904773839833
Cited by
Kim, Y.-S. G. (2017) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643 · Cited by 393
Torppa, M., Niemi, P., Vasalampi, K., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Tolvanen, A., & Poikkeus, A.-M. (2020) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13241 · Cited by 177
Children’s reading difficulties, language, and reflections on the simple view of reading
Nation, K. (2019) · Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties · doi:10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272 · Cited by 159
How Are Practice and Performance Related? Development of Reading From Age 5 to 15
van Bergen, E., Vasalampi, K., & Torppa, M. (2021) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.309 · Cited by 96
Kim, Y.-S. G., & Piper, B. (2019) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9889-7 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Florit, E., & Cain, K.
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 2011-08-23
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 553-576
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W2030352595
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
- The paper
- Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
