The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Healing small-scale fisheries by facilitating complex socio-ecological systems
Open accessAbstract
The current global fisheries crises have immense implications for the health and viability of animal populations, as well as the ecosystems and habitats that support this biodiversity. These crises have provoked a wide variety of management solutions and alternatives that are closely aligned with other small-scale resource extraction conservation approaches, but have been analyzed separately from the common-pool resource management literature. We summarize findings from an analysis of progressive small-scale fisheries worldwide and find that solutions arise from a historical trial and error management process as problems become dire. We find high success in the social organization and regulation of resources among these progressive fisheries but poor evidence for improved ecosystems. Based on evidence provided by the most progressive fisheries, we suggest a change in policy towards the management of small-scale fisheries. This change includes four major avenues of problem solving that focus on facilitating socio-ecological processes rather than primarily promoting a high level of quantitative science and implementing findings, technological concepts, or tools. Adoption is often culturally and context specific and, therefore, the above often have poor success when not socially integrated. We encourage facilitating and catalyzing local-level adoption of rules that create limits to appropriation and technology, since it is increasingly recognized that such limits are key solutions to the threats. This will be achieved if policy and actions (1) encourage professionalism (formation of “societies”, setting standards, certification, self-policing, appropriate technology, etc.), (2) create forums where all opinions about solutions, the status of targeted species, and environmental requirements are represented, (3) promote social rules that consider the realities and limits of the households and local social economy, and (4) craft solutions tailored to the specific and agreed upon diagnoses. We predict that as this socio-ecological process matures, it will also increase the inclusiveness of resource management goals to include non-use factors, such as biodiversity and other ecosystem services, which are still poorly evaluated and managed in even the most progressive small-scale fisheries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges.
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.278 · Cited by 2,798
Global Patterns of Predator Diversity in the Open Oceans
Worm, B., Sandow, M., Oschlies, A., Lotze, H. K., & Myers, R. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113399 · Cited by 419
Cited by
Management of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2017) · The Wiley Handbook of Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1002/9781118970812.ch19 · Cited by 148
A framework for responding to coral disease outbreaks that facilitates adaptive management
Beeden, R., Maynard, J. A., Marshall, P. A., Heron, S. F., & Willis, B. L. (2012) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9770-9 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- McClanahan, T. R., Castilla, J. C., White, A. T., & Defeo, O.
- Venue
- Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
- Published
- 2008-05-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-47
- ISSN
- 0960-3166 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5184
- OpenAlex
- W2041587880
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Healing small-scale fisheries by facilitating complex socio-ecological systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11160-008-9088-8
- The paper
- McClanahan, T. R., Castilla, J. C., White, A. T., & Defeo, O. (2009). Healing small-scale fisheries by facilitating complex socio-ecological systems. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-008-9088-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.