CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 148Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesUniversity-Industry-Government Innovation ModelsCultural Industries and Urban Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems

Autio, Erkko, Levie, Jonathan·2017·The Wiley Handbook of Entrepreneurship
DOI 10.1002/9781118970812.ch19
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is an increasing policy interest toward entrepreneurial ecosystems. Yet, little is actually known about how an entrepreneurial ecosystem works and what the related policy challenges are. Drawing on research on ecological economics and community governance, this chapter develops a theoretical framework for entrepreneurial ecosystem management. Using a Scottish entrepreneurial ecosystem initiative as an example, the authors conclude that policy approaches that emphasize deep stakeholder engagement are likely to give rise to better informed, targeted, and more effectively implemented policy initiatives in entrepreneurial ecosystems than will market failure and structural failure approaches.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118970812.ch19

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Industrial clusters co-evolve within the same network, often driven by cross-fertilization, as the main competitors are based outside the ecosystem or 'coopetive' relationships are formed.

    “Industrial clusters co-­ evolve within the same network, often driven by cross-­ fertilization ( Autio & Levie, 2017) as the main competitors are based outside the ecosystem (Autio et al., 2018 ) or 'coopetive' relationships are formed (Gnyawali et al., 2011).”

    From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Autio & Levie, 2017

  • Mature ecosystems have more efficient resource allocation due to knowledge spillovers.

    “The studies emphasized a more efficient resource allocation of mature ecosystems due to knowledge spillovers (in line with the ecosystem conceptualisation of Acs et al., 2014 ; Autio & Levie, 2017).”

    From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Autio & Levie, 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.5751/ES-00610-090118 · DOI
  3. 10.1515/9781400879762-024 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s11187-014-9554-8 · DOI
  5. Audretsch D., 2011, World encyclopedia of entrepreneurship, 111
  6. Auerswald P. E., 2014, The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness
  7. 10.1007/s10490-014-9381-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.5751/ES-06508-190303 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00015-4 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/1468-0297.00077 · DOI
  13. 10.1108/S0897-3016(2010)0000018008 · DOI
  14. 10.1057/9780230289833 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/978-1-4615-6133-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s11187-006-9007-0 · DOI
  17. Chisholm D., 2014, Increasing innovation‐driven entrepreneurship in Scotland through collective impact
  18. 10.2307/4134389 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015 · DOI
  20. Drexler M., 2014, Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and early‐stage company growth dynamics
  21. Ekeh P. P., 1974, Social exchange theory: Two traditions
  22. 10.1002/9781119204459 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.006 · DOI
  24. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010027.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.007 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nature09689 · DOI
  27. 10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500050 · DOI
  28. Hanleybrown F., 2012, January). Channeling change: Making collective impact work, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1
  29. Hayek F. A., 1945, The use of knowledge in society, American Economic Review, 35, 519
  30. Holling C. S., 1978, Adaptive environmental assessment and management
  31. Isenberg D. J., 2010, How to start an entrepreneurial revolution, Harvard Business Review, 88, 41
  32. Kahan J. P.(2001).Focus groups as a tool for policy analysis.Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 129–146. · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00226-3 · DOI
  34. Kirzner I., 1997, Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60
  35. 10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2_4 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01006.x · DOI
  37. Levie J., 2013, Assessing regional innovative entrepreneurship ecosystems with the global entrepreneurship and development index: The case of Scotland. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Research Conference
  38. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933594.001.0001 · DOI
  39. Lundström A., 2005, Entrepreneurship policy: Theory and practice, 10.1007/b104813 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004 · DOI
  41. Markova I., 2007, Dialogue in focus groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge
  42. Mason C., 2014, Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship
  43. 10.1007/s11160-008-9088-8 · DOI
  44. Meilasari‐Sugiana A., 2012, Collective action and ecological sensibility for sustainable mangrove governance in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities, Journal of Political Ecology, 19, 184, 10.2458/v19i1.21726 · DOI
  45. Meinzen‐Dick R. S., 2004, Collective action and property rights for sustainable development (Focus 11, Brief 1)
  46. 10.2307/2084615 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.011 · DOI
  48. 10.1017/CBO9780511807763 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1076/iaij.3.1.3.7409 · DOI
  50. 10.1023/A:1019019024003 · DOI
  51. Scottish Government, 2011, The Government Economic Strategy
  52. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Sobel R. S. &Hall J. C.(2008).Institutions entrepreneurship and regional differences in economic growth.American Journal of Entrepreneurship 69–96.
  55. 10.1111/etap.12167 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Stam E., 2014, The Dutch entrepreneurial ecosystem, 10.2139/ssrn.2473475 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Stangler D., 2015, Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem, Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship
  59. 10.5751/ES-01896-110239 · DOI
  60. Szerb L., 2013, REDI: the Regional Entrepreneurship and Development Index
  61. 10.1002/sej.34 · DOI
  62. Belt M., 2004, Mediated modeling: A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building
  63. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.06.002 · DOI
  64. Voegel P, 2013, Paper presented at the G20 Youth Forum
  65. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.015 · DOI
  66. 10.1126/science.1198349 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00092-7 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002 · DOI
  69. 10.1596/978-1-4648-0351-2 · DOI
  70. Yin R. K., 1994, Case study research: Design and methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program

    Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789

    “Policy makers should always con - sider prioritizing the bottlenecks in their ecosystem (Acs et al., 2014 ; Autio & Levie, 2017 ) and, particularly at the national level, try to create favorable conditions in which regions with differ - ent strengths and weaknesses can flourish.”

Metadata

Authors
Autio, E., & Levie, J.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
ORCID
Venue
The Wiley Handbook of Entrepreneurship
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-17
Pages
423-449
DOI
10.1002/9781118970812.ch19
OpenAlex
W2735787300
Cited by
148
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Keywords
entrepreneurial ecosystems, ecosystem management, entrepreneurship policy, stakeholder engagement, community governance, ecological economics, market failure, structural failure, policy implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review