Cited by 331Higher Education Research StudiesCareer Development and DiversityHigher Education and Employability

COLLEGE MAJOR CHOICE: An Analysis of Person–Environment Fit

Porter, Stephen R., Umbach, Paul D.·2006·Research in Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11162-005-9002-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Porter, Stephen R.
Venue
Research in Higher Education
Published
2006-02-10
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
429-449
ISSN
  • 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-188X
OpenAlex
W2123298508
Cited by
331
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
22.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
college major choice, person-environment fit, first-year students, liberal arts colleges, student outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review