Cited by 154Career Development and DiversityScience Education and PerceptionsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The influence of students’ participation in STEM competitions on their interest in STEM careers

Miller, Kelly, Sonnert, Gerhard, Sadler, Philip·2018·International Journal of Science Education, Part B

Abstract

Pre-college student participation in science fairs, robotics competitions, computing contests and other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) competitions increases every year in the United States. This is despite the fact that little is known about the relationship between STEM competition participation and career interest in STEM. Through logistic regressions, this study addresses three main research questions: Controlling for student background variables and prior STEM career interest, does participating in a STEM competition increase the likelihood of STEM career interest at the end of high school? Does the field of competition (robotics, engineering, science fair, information technology) a student participates in influence the sub-discipline of STEM career interest? And, what is the relationship between the number of competitions participated in and the probability of interest in a STEM career? The study uses data from the ‘Outreach Programs and Science Career Intentions’ survey (N = 15,847), a large-scale sample of university students enrolled in mandatory English courses. Our data reveal three results of interest. First, students who participate in STEM competitions are more likely to express interest in a STEM-related career at the end of high school than are students who do not participate, even when students’ prior career interest in STEM is controlled for. Second, the relationship between competition participation and interest in a STEM career appears to be domain specific. Third, the impact of competition participation on pursuit of a STEM career is three times stronger when students compete in more than one competition. These findings suggest that competitions are an effective way to foster career interest in specific STEM careers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21548455.2017.1397298

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Kelly
Venue
International Journal of Science Education, Part B
Published
2017-11-07
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
95-114
ISSN
  • 2154-8455 (ISSN-L)
  • 2154-8463
OpenAlex
W2767688018
Cited by
154
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Science Education Part B (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1161052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
STEM competitions, science fairs, robot competition, pre-university students, high school students, domain specificity, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review