The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Students’ Persistence in a Distributed Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership in Higher Education: A Mixed Methods Study
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,866
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,535
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
(2001) · Cited by 25,534
(1998) · Cited by 18,576
The Art of Case Study Research
Johnson, K. E., & Stake, R. E. (1996) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329758 · Cited by 15,826
From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,099
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods
Lotto, L. S., Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1986) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.2307/1163741 · Cited by 10,315
Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 · Cited by 9,184 · cited 1×
“Credibility of the findings was secured by triangulating different sources of information, member checking, inter-coder agreement, rich and thick descriptions of the cases, reviewing and resolving disconfirming evidence, and academic advisor’s auditing (Creswell, 1998; Creswell and Miller, 2002; Lincoln and Guba, 1985…”
Method
Cited by
A review of online course dropout research: implications for practice and future research
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y · Cited by 747
Sverdlik, A., C. Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/4113 · Cited by 616
O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., Waugaman, C., & Jackson, R. (2017) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831217716767 · Cited by 292
Hearing their Voices: Factors Doctoral Candidates Attribute to their Persistence
S. Spaulding, L., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2012) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/1589 · Cited by 258
Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation
Litalien, D., Guay, F., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.006 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L.
- Venue
- Research in Higher Education
- Published
- 2006-05-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-135
- ISSN
- 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-188X
- OpenAlex
- W2100595633
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Students’ Persistence in a Distributed Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership in Higher Education: A Mixed Methods Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
- The paper
- Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2007). Students’ Persistence in a Distributed Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership in Higher Education: A Mixed Methods Study. Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
