Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34Research, Science, and AcademiaJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHigher Education Governance and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Managing Institutional Research Advancement: Implications from a University Faculty Time Allocation Study

Anderson, Derrick M., Slade, Catherine P.·2016·Research in Higher Education
DOI 10.1007/s11162-015-9376-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11162-015-9376-9

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Blau, Peter M. (1994). The organization of academic work. NewBrunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.
  2. Churchman, D. A., & Hellweg, S. A. (1981). The faculty is not in our stars: Self-generated obstacles to securing grants. Grants Magazine, 4(2), 106–110.
  3. Easterly, D. C., & Pemberton, L. A. (2008). Understanding barriers and supports to proposal writing as perceived by female associate professors: Achieving promotion to professor. Research Management Review, 16(1), 1–17.
  4. Hardré, P. L., Beesley, A. D., Miller, R. L., & Pace, T. M. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 5(1), 35–69.
  5. Lechuga, V. M., & Lechuga, D. C. (2012). Faculty motivation and scholarly work: Self-determination and self-regulation perspectives. Journal of the Professoriate, 6(2), 59–97.
  6. Mamiseishvili, K., & Rosser, V. J. (2011). Examining the relationship between faculty productivity and job satisfaction. Journal of The Professoriate, 5(2), 100–132.
  7. Schoenfeld, A. C., & Magnan, R. (1994). Mentoring in a manual: Climbing the academic ladder to tenure (2nd ed.). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

Cited by

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, D. M., & Slade, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Augusta University (US)
Corresponding author
Slade, Catherine P.
ORCID
Slade, Catherine P.
Venue
Research in Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-06-25
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
99-121
ISSN
  • 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-188X
DOI
10.1007/s11162-015-9376-9
OpenAlex
W2238092761
Cited by
34
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Nature
  • Vysoká škola technická a ekonomická v Českých Budějovicích
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
Keywords
faculty time allocation, institutional research, administrative pressure, grant writing, job satisfaction, university administration, hierarchical management, academic researchers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing Institutional Research Advancement: Implications from a University Faculty Time Allocation Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11162-015-9376-9
The paper
Anderson, D. M., & Slade, C. P. (2016). Managing Institutional Research Advancement: Implications from a University Faculty Time Allocation Study. Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9376-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.