Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nature of Science, Scientific Inquiry, and Socio-Scientific Issues Arising from Genetics: A Pathway to Developing a Scientifically Literate Citizenry

Lederman, Norman G., Antink, Allison, Bartos, Stephen·2014·Science & Education
DOI 10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. American Society of Reproductive Medicine. (1999). Sex selection of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility, 72(4), 595–598. · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00319-2
  2. American Society of Reproductive Medicine. (2001). Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertility and Sterility, 75(5), 861–864. · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01756-3
  3. Center of Unified Science Education. (1974). The dimensions of scientific literacy. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
  4. Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers. (1907). A consideration of the principles that should determine the courses in biology in the secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 7, 241–247. · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1907.tb01009.x
  5. Klopfer, L. E., & Watson, F. G. (1957). Historical materials and high school science teaching. The Science Teacher, 24(6), 264–293.
  6. Koeppel, D. (2008). Banana: The fate of the fruit that changed the world. New York: Hudson Street Press.
  7. Rasko, J. E. J., & Jolly, D. J. (2006). The science of inheritable genetic modification. In J. Rasko, G. O’Sullivan, & R. Ankeny (Eds.), The Ethics of inheritable genetic modification: A dividing line? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511584275
  8. Scott, J. A. (2006). Inheritable genetic modification: clinical applications and genetic counseling considerations. In J. Rasko, G. O’Sullivan, & R. Ankeny (Eds.), The ethics of inheritable genetic modification: A dividing line?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Showalter, V. (1975). What is unified science education? Program objectives and scientific literacy, Prism II, 2(3–4), 1–6.
  10. Singer, P. (2003). Shopping at the genetic supermarket. In S. Y. Song, Y. M. Koo, & D. R. J. Macer (Eds.), Asian bioethics in the 21st century (pp. 143–156). Christchurch, New Zealand: Eubios Ethics Institute.

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S.
Venue
Science & Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-06-13
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
285-302
ISSN
  • 0926-7220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1901
DOI
10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
OpenAlex
W2015310434
Cited by
295
References
38
FWCI
32.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nature of Science, Scientific Inquiry, and Socio-Scientific Issues Arising from Genetics: A Pathway to Developing a Scientifically Literate Citizenry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
The paper
Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of Science, Scientific Inquiry, and Socio-Scientific Issues Arising from Genetics: A Pathway to Developing a Scientifically Literate Citizenry. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.