Explicitly Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in a History Course
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies report finding no relationship between understanding of science acquired through formal education and false beliefs.
“Furthermore, several studies report finding no relationship between understanding of science (acquired through formal education) and false beliefs (Goode, 2002;McLaughlin & McGill, 2017).”
From Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning (2024) · cites this paper as McLaughlin & McGill, 2017
Cites
When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612 · Cited by 2,076 · see citing works
Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611434786 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Kane, M. J., Core, T. J., & Hunt, R. R. (2010) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.17.2.206 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bellaera, L., Weinstein-Jones, Y., Ilie, S., & Baker, S. T. (2021) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning
Dyer, K. D. (2024) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12967 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- McLaughlin, A. C., & McGill, A. E.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McLaughlin, Anne Collins
- Venue
- Science & Education
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 93-105
- ISSN
- 0926-7220 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1901
- OpenAlex
- W2599339618
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 27.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
- Keywords
- critical thinking, history education, skepticism, humanities education, history course, honors students, individual differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
