The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing Computational Thinking Skills Through Artificial Intelligence Education at a STEAM High School
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies in this area often involve teaching students about AI itself or using AI to support algorithmic thinking, coding instruction, or learning analytics [56].”
From Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education: trends, benefits, and challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Wing, J. M. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215 · Cited by 8,102
Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988510 · Cited by 4,133 · cited 1×
“Chen et al. (2020) maintained that AI exerted a major influence on education, particularly on the administration, instruction, and learning areas of the education sector.”
Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3 · Cited by 1,229
A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS)
Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005 · Cited by 799
Challenges and Future Directions of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Education
Luan, H., Geczy, P., Lai, H., Gobert, J., Yang, S. J. H., Ogata, H., Baltes, J., Guerra, R., Li, P., & Tsai, C.-C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820 · Cited by 667
The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning
Tuan, H., Chin, C.-C., & Shieh, S. (2005) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069042000323737 · Cited by 648
Hwang, G., & Tu, Y. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9060584 · Cited by 558
Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Bañeres, D., Guerrero‐Roldán, A., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020800 · Cited by 510
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM Education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT), 335–358. Retrieved August 12, 2019, from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327351326_STEAM_Education_an_overview_of_creating_a_model_of_integrative_education.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147 · Cited by 745
Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education: trends, benefits, and challenges
Garzón, J., Patiño, E., & Marulanda, C. (2025) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti9080084 · Cited by 265
“Studies in this area often involve teaching students about AI itself or using AI to support algorithmic thinking, coding instruction, or learning analytics [56].”
El-Sayed, B. K. M., El‐Sayed, A. A. I., Alsenany, S. A., & Asal, M. G. R. (2024) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104208 · Cited by 136
Risks of AI-Assisted Learning on Student Critical Thinking
Çela, E., Fonkam, M. M., & Potluri, R. M. (2024) · International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management · doi:10.4018/ijrcm.350185 · Cited by 90
Jing, Y., Wang, H., Chen, X., & Wang, C. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02751-w · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, X., & Qiao, C.
- Affiliations
- Capital Normal University (CN)
- Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Qiao, Chengche
- Venue
- Science & Education
- Published
- 2022-10-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 383-403
- ISSN
- 0926-7220 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1901
- OpenAlex
- W4304140101
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Science & Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National New Liberal Arts Research and Reform Practice Project (2021180001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, computational thinking, STEAM education, high school students, interdisciplinary curriculum, student motivation, self-efficacy, AI curriculum design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
