Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education
Open accessAbstract
The field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) has undergone significant developments over the last twenty-five years. As we reflect on our past and shape our future, we ask two main questions: What are our major strengths? And, what new opportunities lay on the horizon? We analyse 47 papers from three years in the history of the Journal of AIED (1994, 2004, and 2014) to identify the foci and typical scenarios that occupy the field of AIED. We use those results to suggest two parallel strands of research that need to take place in order to impact education in the next 25 years: One is an evolutionary process, focusing on current classroom practices, collaborating with teachers, and diversifying technologies and domains. The other is a revolutionary process where we argue for embedding our technologies within students’ everyday lives, supporting their cultures, practices, goals, and communities.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper reviews 47 IJAIED papers from 1994, 2004, and 2014 to map AIED’s evolution, finding increased empirical rigor, a STEM/step-based focus, and limited technology/setting diversity. It argues for both evolutionary work within current classrooms and revolutionary work embedding AIED in learners’ everyday lives, cultures, and communities.
Key findings
- Empirical papers rose from 1/20 (5%) in 1994 to 8/13 (62%) in 2004 and 10/14 (71%) in 2014; focus shifted toward system description and evaluation.
- STEM focus increased: among empirical papers, 2014 had n = 8 (80%) STEM; breadth also increased, with 2014 empirical papers at n = 5 (50%) many topics >1 month, n = 3 (30%) few topics <5 h, and n = 2 (20%) 1 topic <1 h.
- Interaction moved toward step-based: 2014 empirical step-based n = 6 (60%), complex problems n = 5 (50%), exploratory/games n = 1 (10%); 2014 included many collaboration examples, whereas 1994 and 2004 had few.
- Technology/setting remained narrow: all but one 1994 paper used desktop/laptop and all but one 1994 aimed at formal school; most learning goals were domain-level, with 2014 motivation measured by surveys in n = 3 and only one paper surveying other motivation aspects. Geographic skew: 43/47 papers from North America, Europe, and Oceania; 3 from East Asia, 1 from South America, none from Africa or South East Asia.
Methods
- Content analysis of 47 papers from IJAIED 1994 (20), 2004 (13), and 2014 (14), including regular and special issue papers.
- Coded each paper on type/focus, domain/breadth, interaction style/collaborative structure, technology/setting, and learning goals; multiple codes were allowed, and N/A was used when a dimension was irrelevant or information was missing.
- Linguistic analysis of abstracts: removed function words, converted content words to root form, and used textalyser.net to identify the ten most common words by year.
Limitations
- The authors state most papers did not report teacher involvement or complementary classroom practices, so classroom context could not be analyzed; some dimensions were N/A due missing or irrelevant information.
- The authors note special issues contributed to 2014 trends, and the review covers only IJAIED papers from three years rather than the whole field (stated/evident).
- Evident: the linguistic analysis is simple and abstract-only, and coding relies on available paper text, so dimensions may be undercounted when information is missing.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
The field has been moving towards increasing the focus on step-based systems.
“As can be seen, we have been moving towards increasing the focus on step-based systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
With the exception of a single paper from 1994, all reviewed systems were designed to be used in formal school environments (classroom or homework).
“Similarly, with the exception of a single paper from 1994, all systems were designed to be used in formal school environments (be it in the classroom or for homework).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a lack of focus on novel research methods in the reviewed papers.
“At the same time, the lack of focus on novel research methods is somewhat unexpected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is an increase in the rate of papers that discuss the theoretical implications and contributions of their work.
“We were glad to see an increase in the rate of papers that discuss the theoretical implications and contributions of their work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With the exception of a single paper from 1994, all reviewed papers described users working with a desktop or laptop computer.
“With the exception of a single paper from 1994, all papers described users working with a desktop or laptop computer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
A vast majority of the papers in 2004 and 2014 focus on system description and evaluation.
“As shown in Table 2, a vast majority of the papers in 2004 and 2014 focuses on system description and evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most empirical papers that measured motivation in 2014 (n = 3) did so using surveys to measure satisfaction.
“Most empirical papers that measured motivation in 2014 (n = 3) did so using surveys to measure satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The most prominent trend in the domain table is the increasing focus on STEM.
“Perhaps the most prominent trend in this table is the increasing focus on STEM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many of the reviewed papers facilitated aspects of learning such as supporting collaboration, addressing gaming-the-system, or scaffolding goal-setting.
“Our analysis shows that many of the reviewed papers facilitated these aspects of learning (e.g., supporting collaboration, addressing gaming-the-system, or scaffolding goal-setting).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The vast majority of the reviewed papers focus on domain-level learning.
“As shown in Table 7, the vast majority of the papers focus on domain-level learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only one paper from 2014 surveyed other aspects of motivation (e.g., self-efficacy) in a more substantial way.
“As far as we can tell, only one paper from 2014 surveyed other aspects of motivation (e.g., self-efficacy) in a more substantial way (Arroyo et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Arroyo et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In the IJAIED publications coded, new technologies that offer exciting opportunities were not used.
“New technologies that offer exciting opportunities were not used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most reviewed papers did not provide an answer about teacher involvement in the research.
“Interestingly, most papers did not provide an answer to this question.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
One context that is missing from the reviewed AIED work is informal learning.
“Additionally, one context that is missing is informal learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The vast majority of the work reviewed focuses on stand-alone environments, with ILE used as-is without strong connections with its surroundings.
“The vast majority of the work that we reviewed focuses on stand-alone environments.In most studies the ILE is used as-is, without strong connections with its surroundings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The analysis could not find sufficient evidence for complementary classroom practices-what students did in addition to working with the system.
“Similarly, we could not find sufficient evidence for complementary classroom practices -what did students do in addition to working with the system?”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All 47 reviewed papers (with the exception of a single paper from 1994) aim for classroom or homework use.
“All 47 papers we reviewed (with the exception of a single paper from 1994) aim for classroom or homework use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the IJAIED publications coded, all papers except one used a computer.
“All papers, with only one exception, used a computer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Information about classroom context was so rarely provided that the authors were not able to analyse papers along this dimension.
“In fact, information about classroom context was so rarely provided that we were not able to analyse papers along this dimension.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 1994 empirical papers, 1 (100%) used complex problems.
“| Empirical | 1994 | | n = 1 (100 %) | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
ASSISTments uses homework assignments from existing textbooks.
“One rare exception is ASSISTments, which uses homework assignments from existing textbooks (Heffernan & Heffernan, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heffernan & Heffernan, 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is a growing movement to use assessments to capture learning trajectories and processes, shifting assessment from a summative measure of performance to an ongoing formative measure that informs just-in-time support.
“While assessments were used previously to measure the knowledge state of the learner, there is a growing movement to use assessments to capture learning trajectories and processes.Assessment shifts from being a summative measure of performance to an on going formative measure that informs just-in-time support (Collins & Halverson, 2010;Shute, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Educational goals are moving away from preparation for a rigid body of knowledge and toward giving students tools to become adaptive experts and on-the-job learners.
“Educational goals are moving away from preparation for workforce in terms of a rigid body of knowledge and in favour of giving students the tools to become adaptive experts and on-the-job learners (Common Core, 2012;NGSS, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Common Core, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites NGSS, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Data suggests that students are in need of greater support.
“While theory suggests that constructivist activities are beneficial, data suggests that students are in need of greater support (Tobias & Duffy, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tobias & Duffy, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The gStudy browser add-on is an example of an existing resource.
“Some examples already exist out there, such as the gStudy browser add-on (Winne & Hadwin, 2013) or our own work on PhET-based assessments (Kardan et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Winne & Hadwin, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The clear focus on step-based, well-defined problems in STEM topics, targeting domain-level knowledge, may limit the scope of AIED.
“At the same time, the clear focus on step-based, well-defined problems in STEM topics, targeting domain-level knowledge, may limit our scope.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Current classroom practices incorporate much more authentic elements, including authentic problems, experiential learning opportunities, and group work.
“Current classroom practices incorporate much more authentic elements.These include authentic problems (Hmelo-Silver et al., 2007), experiential learning opportunities, group work, etc.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hmelo-Silver et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Classrooms often include activities that could benefit from additional support.
“Thus, classrooms often include activities that could benefit from additional support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The role of the teacher in the classroom is changing from the 'sage on the stage' to 'the guide on the side'.
“From the Bsage on the stage^, teachers become Bthe guide on the side^ (King, 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites King, 1993 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The goals, theories, and practices of education have evolved as the field of AIED evolved.
“As the field of AIED evolved so did the goals, theories, and practices of education (e.g., Chi & Wylie, 2014;Hake, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The skewed geographic map suggests that as a community, AIED includes privileged researchers who address privileged problems.
“This skewed map suggests that as a community, AIED includes privileged researchers who address privileged problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The dynamic nature of job requirements encourages schools to develop curricula that focus on knowledge application, collaboration, and self-regulated learning skills.
“Furthermore, the dynamic nature of job requirements encourages schools to develop curricula that focus on knowledge application, collaboration, and selfregulated learning skills (Toner, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Toner, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
With advancements in modelling techniques, the focus shifted towards testing environments.
“With the advancements in modelling techniques, the focus shifted towards testing environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
- May combine two claims. 21
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe analysis of 47 papers from 1994, 2004, and 2014 reveals a clear increase in the level of evaluative rigor of papers.
“Our analysis reveals a clear increase in the level of evaluative rigor of papers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Empirical papers demonstrate a higher level of rigor than non-empirical papers.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is a very strong increase in the breadth of content covered and in the time spent using the environments in empirical papers.
“As shown in Table 4, there is a very strong increase in the breadth of content that is covered and in the time spent using the environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMany results of the linguistic analysis of abstracts echo the trends reported above.
“As shown in Table 8, many of these results echo the trends reported above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe reviewed papers show more empirical work, increased rigor, and increased support for collaboration.
“We see more empirical work, increased rigor, and increased support for collaboration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Empirical papers demonstrate a higher level of rigor than non-empirical papers.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe field shifted to include more stakeholders: teacher appears in the 2004 and 2014 lists but not in 1994, and is more frequent in 2014 than in 2004.
“Similarly, we see the field shifting to include more stakeholders: teacher appears both in the 2004 and 2014 lists but not in 1994, and is more frequent in 2014 than in 2004.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenWith existing systems, teachers were often viewed as on-site technical support and guardians of their students, facilitating interaction but not much more.
“With existing systems, teachers were often viewed as on-site technical support and guardians of their students, in the sense that teachers facilitate the interaction, but not much more than that.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe linguistic analysis supports the observation of moving from knowledge as a product to learning as a process; knowledge was the third most frequently used word in 1994 and was replaced.
“The analysis also supports the observation of moving from knowledge as a product to learning as a process; knowledge was the third most frequently used word in 1994, and was replaced”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataOverall, the data suggests that AIED has been focusing on a very specific scenario: the use of computers in the classroom to teach domain knowledge in STEM topics using step-based problems.
“Overall, our data suggests that AIED has been focusing on a very specific scenario, and has been doing it well: the use of computers in the classroom to teach domain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors found no examples of K-12 schools being listed as affiliations on the reviewed papers themselves; participating teachers were also affiliated with the university, and teachers who are not academics were not listed on any publication.
“we found no examples of K-12 schools being listed as affiliations on the papers themselves.That is, participating teachers were also affiliated with the university.Teachers who are not academics were not listed on any publication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStudent is the most frequent word in abstracts each year and system is in the top three across years.
“Student is the most frequent word each year and system is in the top three across years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 47 reviewed papers, 43 come from North America, Europe, and Oceania; four have authors from other regions (three from East Asia and one from South America); none are authored by researchers from Africa or South East Asia.
“Currently, of the 47 papers that we have reviewed, 43 come from North America, Europe, and Oceania.Only four papers have authors from other regions: three from East Asia and one from South America.There are no papers authored by researchers from Africa or South East Asia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 2004 non-empirical papers, 2 (40%) used step-based problem solving and 1 (20%) complex problems.
“| | 2004 | n = 2 (40 %) | n = 1 (20 %) | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe word web appears in the 2004 list and disappears from the 2014 list.
“Interestingly, web appears in 2004 and disappears again from the 2014 list.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 2004 empirical papers, 2 (25%) used step-based problem solving, 3 (38%) complex problems, and 3 (38%) exploratory environments and games.
“| | 2004 | n = 2 (25 %) | n = 3 (38 %) | n = 3 (38 %) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 1994 non-empirical papers, 8 (42%) used step-based problem solving, 7 (37%) complex problems, and 1 (05%) exploratory environments and games.
“| Non-empirical | 1994 | n = 8 (42 %) | n = 7 (37 %) | n = 1 (05 %) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 2014 empirical papers, 6 (60%) used step-based problem solving, 5 (50%) complex problems, and 1 (10%) exploratory environments and games.
“| | 2014 | n = 6 (60 %) | n = 5 (50 %) | n = 1 (10 %) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe analysis included 20 papers from 1994, 13 from 2004, and 14 from 2014.
“| 1994 | 15 | 5 | Language learning (n = 5) | 20 |”
- Also stated in: § Concluding Remarks · plain
“| 2004 | 13 | 0 | n/a | 13 |”
- Also stated in: § Concluding Remarks · plain
“| 2014 | 3 | 11 | Learning in groups (n = 4); Emerging | 14 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Concluding Remarks · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is evidence of a shift from theory to empirical analysis, with a gradual decline in the use of the word model from 1994 to 2004, until it no longer appears as a common word in 2014.
“We also see evidence of the shift from theory to empirical analysis with a gradual decline in the use of the word model from 1994 to 2004, until it no longer appears as a common word in 2014.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningEnvironments that incorporate collaboration can trace, model, and support collaborative processes, thus potentially improving a significant component of today's schooling experience.
“Environments that incorporate collaboration can trace, model, and support these processes, thus potentially improving a significant component of today's schooling experience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Students are becoming more adept at communicating using technology.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy building and contributing to theories of learning, the field of AIED adopts higher standards and a more holistic approach to the study of education.
“By building and contributing to theories of learning, the field of AIED adopts higher standards and a more holistic approach to the study of education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Empirical papers demonstrate a higher level of rigor than non-empirical papers.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe increasing focus on step-based systems is natural given the success in this type of work.
“This is natural, given the success in this type of work (VanLehn, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites VanLehn, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe presence of two special issues on STEM in 2014 and a special issue on Language Learning in 1994 reflects the interest of the AIED community.
“the fact that there were two special issues on STEM (and a special issue on Language Learning in 1994) reflects the interest of our community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Special issues reflect current values and areas of interest for the community.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA major challenge for current schooling practices is personalization, because learners bring different experiences, goals, and backgrounds while the current schooling system struggles to offer individualized learning paths.
“Another major challenge for current schooling practices is that of personalization (Collins & Halverson, 2010).While learners bring different experiences, goals, and backgrounds, the current schooling system struggles to offer individualized learning paths.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Collins & Halverson, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTheory suggests that constructivist activities are beneficial.
“While theory suggests that constructivist activities are beneficial, data suggests that students are in need of greater support (Tobias & Duffy, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tobias & Duffy, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenContinuing the trajectories identified above will support the growth of the field, but these changes alone will not actualize the full potential of AIED.
“While continuing the trajectories that were identified above will support the growth of our field, we argue that these changes alone will not actualize the full potential of AIED.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenLeading MOOC vendors have begun to offer their own credentials, creating a new type of certification.
“In fact, leading MOOC vendors have begun to offer their own credentials (Coursera, edX), creating a new type of certification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBy definition, informal learning opportunities lack the support structures that are available in more established settings.
“By the very definition of being informal, these opportunities lack the support structures that are available in more established settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe researchers in Martin et al. (2013) track how information is shared between devices to support social learning.
“The researchers then track how information is being shared between devices, in order to support social learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martin et al. (2013)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThese changes in the landscape of education offer significant challenges to the present focus of AIED.
“These changes in the landscape of education offer significant challenges to the present focus of AIED.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany MOOC learners come from the developing world, and in general, MOOC students are post-graduate learners.
“Many MOOC learners come from the developing world (Christensen et al., 2013), and in general, MOOC students are post-graduate learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Christensen et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningBroadening focus in terms of technologies will allow for new kinds of interactions among learners and with their environment.
“Thus, broadening our focus in terms of technologies will also allow for new kinds of interactions among learners and with their environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: New types of sensors on mobile devices allow context-awareness (e.g., accelerometers, GPS).
- Rests on an assumption: New kinds of input devices allow novel modes of interaction (e.g., multi-touch, cameras).
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMartin et al. (2013) offer a programming environment on a handheld.
“For example, Martin et al. (2013) offer a programming environment on a handheld.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martin et al. (2013)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of data about teacher involvement and complementary classroom practices may reflect a perceived lack of value of this information.
“The lack of data about these may reflect a perceived lack of value of this information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationEducation is a socio-cultural phenomenon.
“Education is a socio-cultural phenomena (Vygotsky, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vygotsky, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTeachers are no longer expected to possess all relevant knowledge and transmit it to learners; instead, they are tasked with supporting learners in seeking, finding, and integrating information and becoming independent collaborative thinkers.
“Teachers are no longer expected to possess all relevant knowledge and to transmit it to learners.Instead, they are tasked with supporting their learners in seeking, finding, and integrating information, and becoming independent collaborative thinkers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe authors' work on PhET-based assessments is an example of an existing resource.
“Some examples already exist out there, such as the gStudy browser add-on (Winne & Hadwin, 2013) or our own work on PhET-based assessments (Kardan et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kardan et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne outcome of these changes is increased complexity in assignments, learning goals, required literacies, and classroom interactions and orchestration.
“One outcome of these changes is increased complexity complexity in the assignments (e.g., from calculation to Problem-Based Learning), complexity in learning goals (e.g., from recall to information seeking and synthesis), complexity in required literacies (e.g., from verbal literacy to technology and information literacies; Katz 2013), and complexity of classroom interactions and orchestration (e.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Katz 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dillenbourg, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Martin et al. (2013) programming environment allows learners to interact directly with each other as they move in space.
“This allows learners to interact directly with each other, as they move in space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martin et al. (2013)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKnowledge is becoming a verb (something we do) rather than a noun (something we possess).
“Knowledge is becoming a verb (something we do) rather than a noun (something we possess; Gilbert, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gilbert, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese trends are often at conflict with one another; for example, MOOCs typically include nothing but a talking head and low-level multiple-choice items, in contrast to the 'guide on the side' classroom trend.
“Interestingly, these trends are often at conflict with one another: for example, MOOCs typically include nothing but a talking head and low-level multiple-choice items, which is in stark contrast to the Bguide on the side^classroom trend.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMillions of learners every year enroll in MOOCs.
“Currently, millions of learners every year enroll in MOOCs (Pappano, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pappano, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Empirical papers demonstrate a higher level of rigor than non-empirical papers.
“Throughout our analysis we distinguish between non-empirical and empirical papers, as empirical papers demonstrate a higher level of rigor.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Special issues reflect current values and areas of interest for the community.
“we believe that special issues reflect current values and areas of interest for the community.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students are becoming more adept at communicating using technology.
“as students are becoming more adept at communicating using technology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
New technologies (handhelds, wearables, robotics) are becoming cheaper and more ubiquitous.
“These technologies are becoming cheaper and more ubiquitous.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Testing technologies and theories over time and across topics increases the rigor of research.
“This also increases the rigor of our work, by testing technologies and theories over time and across topics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current views on teaching and learning expand and extend beyond the classroom to informal and workplace learning.
“current views on teaching and learning expand and extend beyond the classroom to informal and workplace learning.”
The paper relies on this without support.
New types of sensors on mobile devices allow context-awareness (e.g., accelerometers, GPS).
“New types of sensors on mobile devices allow us to be context-aware (e.g., accelerometers, GPS).”
The paper relies on this without support.
New kinds of input devices allow novel modes of interaction (e.g., multi-touch, cameras).
“New kind of input devices allow for novel modes of interaction (e.g.multi-touch, cameras).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Presently, ILE developers develop their own content.
“Presently, ILE developers develop their own content.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Using existing textbooks in ASSISTments is very labour intensive.
“However, this is very labour intensive.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many systems already have a wide user base.
“In addition to increasing flexibility and reducing labour, many systems already have a wide user base.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Learning Sciences community has been pushing for increased authenticity and work in context.
“For example, the Learning Sciences community has been pushing for increased authenticity and work in context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ILE have unique affordances that human tutors do not.
“Simply speaking, ILE have unique affordances that human tutors do not, and the next generation of systems should leverage those affordances to support learning anytime, anywhere, by anyone.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Modelling work has continued to take centre stage in other venues, such as the Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, the Journal of Educational Data Mining, and The Journal of Learning Analytics.
“Notably, modelling work has continued to take centre stage in other venues, such as the Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (est.1991), the Journal of Educational Data Mining (est.2008), and The Journal of Learning Analytics (est.2014).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-powered discussion platforms, such as Packback, can simulate peer interactions for remote learners, promoting engagement and deeper understanding of course material.
“For instance, AI-powered discussion platforms, first used during the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., Packback), can simulate peer interactions for remote learners, promoting engagement and a deeper understanding of course material [27, 28].”
From Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
The paper’s “Interaction Style and Collaborative Structure” section (page unavailable) identifies discussion forums as a way learners interact asynchronously and says collaborative learning environments can potentially improve schooling. It does not discuss Packback, COVID-19, simulated peer interactions, or demonstrate greater engagement and deeper understanding for remote learners. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEducators often report difficulty distinguishing AI from other digital technologies, complicating how they interpret its role in pedagogy.
“Demonstrating conceptual uncertainty, educators often report difficulty distinguishing AI from other digital technologies, complicating how they interpret its role in pedagogy (Roll & Wylie, 2016).”
From Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as Roll & Wylie, 2016
The Embedded in Context section calls for teachers to collaborate in AIED research and for study of how technology changes pedagogy. The Technology and Setting section distinguishes types of technology used in AIED research, but neither section reports that educators have difficulty distinguishing AI from other digital technologies or interpreting its pedagogical role. Searches for those perceptions found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEmpirical studies focusing on K-12 contexts remain limited.
“empirical studies focusing on K-12 contexts remain limited (Chiu et al., 2023;Nigam et al., 2021;Roll & Wylie, 2016).”
From Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as Roll & Wylie, 2016
The Type and Focus of Paper section reports that empirical papers increased in the journal sample, but does not break them down by K–12 context. Embedded in Context says no K–12 schools were listed as author affiliations; that does not establish that empirical studies in K–12 settings were limited. Searches for K–12 empirical studies and primary or secondary school research found no passage making the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704 · see citing works
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 · Cited by 6,887 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, many existing classroom structures are inapt for engaging students in Bbig^ problems (Kirschner et al., 2006; Tobias & Duffy, 2009) or for offering students choice (Collins & Halverson, 2010).”
Background(2013) · Cited by 6,708 · see citing works
Hake, R. R. (1998) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.18809 · Cited by 6,072 · see citing works
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
(2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816833 · Cited by 4,660 · see citing works
21st century skills: learning for life in our times
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5788 · Cited by 2,990 · see citing works
The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 · Cited by 2,911 · see citing works
Self-citationHMELO-SILVER, C. E., DUNCAN, R. G., & CHINN, C. A. (2007) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520701263368 · Cited by 2,641 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These include authentic problems (Hmelo-Silver et al., 2007) , experiential learning opportunities, group work, etc.”
BackgroundVanLEHN, K. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 · Cited by 2,323 · see citing works
From sage on the stage to guide on the side
King, A. (1993) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781 · Cited by 1,462 · see citing works
The Behavior of Tutoring Systems
VanLehn, K. A. (2006) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2006-16(3)02 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Yadav, J., Shukla, S., Sharma, K., Soni, N., Agarwal, S., & Pathak, P. C. (2022) · International Conference on Computation, Automation and Knowledge Management (ICCAKM) · doi:10.1109/iccakm54721.2022.9990098 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0024-x · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Constructivist instruction : success or failure?
Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009) · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Computer Games and Instruction.
Tobias, S., & Fletcher, J. D. (2011) · Cited by 484 · see citing works
The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why?Preprint
Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2350964 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00339.x · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Design for classroom orchestration
Dillenbourg, P. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.013 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.004 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Self-citation(2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203878842 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System
Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2008-18(3)02 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
AutoTutor and Family: A Review of 17 Years of Natural Language Tutoring
Nye, B. D., Graesser, A. C., & Hu, X. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0029-5 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
(1993) · Intelligent Tutoring Media · doi:10.1080/14626269309408330 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Nye, B. D. (2015) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System
Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., Evenson, S., Roll, I., Wagner, A. Z., Naim, M., Raspat, J., Baker, D. J., & Beck, J. E. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11774303_39 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Self-citationSHERLOCK: A Coached Practice Environment for an Electronics Troubleshooting Job
Lesgold, A. M., Lajoie, S. P., Bunzo, M., & Eggan, G. (1988) · doi:10.21236/ada201748 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Catching the Knowledge Wave? the Knowledge Society and the Future of Education
Openshaw, R. (2007) · New Zealand journal of psychology · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Testing Information Literacy in Digital Environments: ETS's iSkills Assessment
Katz, I. R. (2007) · Information Technology and Libraries · doi:10.6017/ital.v26i3.3271 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
SIETTE: A Web-Based Tool for Adaptive Testing
Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J.-L., & Ríos, A. (2004) · doi:10.5555/1434852.1434855 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
A model for negotiation in teaching-learning dialogues
Baker, M. J. (1994) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Applications of simulated students: an exploration
VanLehn, K. A., Ohlsson, S., & Nason, R. (1994) · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Towards an Agile Approach to Adapting Dynamic Collaboration Support to Student Needs
Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0012-6 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
nStudy: Tracing and Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in the Internet
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_20 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Benefits of Virtual Characters in Computer Based Learning Environments: Claims and Evidence
Gulz, A. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(3-4)04 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Education and the Semantic Web
Devedžić, V. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(2)02 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Student Modelling Based on Belief Networks
Reye, J. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(1)04 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Workforce Skills and Innovation
Toner, P. (2011) · OECD education working papers · doi:10.1787/5kgk6hpnhxzq-en · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Adaptive Intelligent Support to Improve Peer Tutoring in Algebra
Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0001-9 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
An Intelligent Tutoring System for Entity Relationship Modelling
Suraweera, P., & Mitrović, A. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(3-4)07 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Dzikovska, M. O., Steinhauser, N. B., Farrow, E., Moore, J. D., & Campbell, G. E. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0017-9 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Interacting with Inspectable Bayesian Student Models
Zapata‐Rivera, D., & Greer, J. E. (2004) · doi:10.5555/1434858.1434859 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
On the Benefits of Seeking (and Avoiding) Help in Online Problem-Solving Environments
Roll, I., Baker, R. S. J. D., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2014) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.883977 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationCen, H., Koedinger, K. R., & Junker, B. W. (2007) · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Cognitive tutors : technology bringing learning science to the classroom
Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2006) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 90 · see citing works
A Teachable Agent Game Engaging Primary School Children to Learn Arithmetic Concepts and Reasoning
Pareto, L. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0018-8 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Tegos, S. D., Demetriadis, S., & Tsiatsos, Τ. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0007-3 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Yoo, J., & Kim, J. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0010-8 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Educational Software Features that Encourage and Discourage “Gaming the System”
S.J.d., B. R., de Carvalho, A. M. J. B., Raspat, J., Aleven, V., Corbett, A. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-028-5-475 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Looking Ahead to Select Tutorial Actions: A Decision-Theoretic Approach
Murray, R. C., VanLehn, K. A., & Mostow, J. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(3-4)02 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Using Intelligent Feedback to Improve Sourcing and Integration in Students' Essays
Britt, M. A., Hastings, P., Larson, A. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(3-4)06 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Collaborative Information Filtering: A Review and an Educational Application
Walker, A., Recker, M. M., Lawless, K. A., et al. (2004) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.5555/1434852.1434854 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Towards Understanding How to Assess Help-Seeking Behavior Across Cultures
Ogan, A., Walker, E., Baker, R. S., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Soriano, J. C. A., & Jiménez-Castro, M. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0034-8 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Reinforcing Math Knowledge by Immersing Students in a Simulated Learning-By-Teaching Experience
Lenat, D. B., & Durlach, P. J. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0016-x · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., & Pardos, Z. A. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0011-7 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Performance support systems: integrating AI, hypermedia, and CBT to enhance user performance
McGraw, K. L. (1994) · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Khachatryan, G. A., Romashov, A. V., Khachatryan, A. R., Gaudino, S., Khachatryan, J. M., Guarian, K. R., & Yufa, N. V. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0019-7 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning
Shute, V. J. (2011) · Computer Games and Instruction · doi:10.1108/978-1-61735-410-620251025 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
THEMIS: a nonmonotonic inductive student modeling system
Kono, Y., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (1994) · Cited by 37 · see citing works
FITS : A Framework for ITS-A Computational Model of Tutoring
Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (1994) · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Analysing Student Programs in the PHP Intelligent Tutoring System
Weragama, D., & Reye, J. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0014-z · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Carelessness and Affect in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Mathematics
Pedro, M. O. Z. S., Baker, R. S., & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0015-y · Cited by 36 · see citing works
A Collaborative Case Study System for Distance Learning
Rosatelli, M. C., & Self, J. A. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(1)05 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Expertise, Motivation and Teaching in Learning Companion Systems
Uresti, J. A. R., & du Boulay, B. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(2)03 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Deductive error diagnosis and inductive error generalization for intelligent tutoring systems
Hoppe, H. U. (1994) · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Evaluating the REDEEM Authoring Tool: Can Teachers Create Effective Learning Environments?
Ainsworth, S. E., & Grimshaw, S. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(3-4)03 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Teaching through collaborative problem solving
BLANDFORD, A. E. (1994) · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A knowledge-based, English verb-form tutor
BOS, E., & van de Plassche, J. (1994) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Children's Interactions with Animated Agents in an Intelligent Tutoring System
Robertson, J., Cross, B., MACLEOD, H. A., & Hastings, P. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(3-4)05 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Learning Programming with IPRO: The Effects of a Mobile, Social Programming Environment.
Martin, T., Berland, M., Benton, T., & Smith, C. P. (2013) · The Journal of Interactive Learning Research · Cited by 15 · see citing works
The Usefulness of Log Based Clustering in a Complex Simulation Environment
Kardan, S., Roll, I., & Conati, C. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_21 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationChandler, T. N. (1994) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Foreign language immersion: science, practice, and a system
Hamburger, H. (1994) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Lomas, D., Kumar, A., Patel, K., Ching, D., Lakshmanan, M., Kam, M., & Forlizzi, J. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2481379 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Matthews, C. A. (1994) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Lee, V. R., Lei, Y., & Recker, M. M. (2012) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.22318/icls2012.2.172 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Exploiting program schemata in an automated program debugger
Gegg-Harrison, T. S. (1994) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A dynamic view on cognitive student modeling in computer programming
Bertels, K. (1994) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Dealing with pragmatic and implicit information in an ICALL system: the PILE´FACE example
Lelouche, R. (1994) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Individualization within a multi-agent computer-assisted learning-to-read environment
Chambreuil, A., Chambreuil, M., & Cherkaoui, C. (1994) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Complex: a tool for the development of L2 vocabulary knowledge
Harrington, M. (1994) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
SIETTE: A Web-Based Tool for Adaptive Testing
Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J.-L., & Ríos, A. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(1)03 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Collaborative Information Filtering: A Review and an Educational Application
Walker, A., Recker, M. M., Lawless, K. A., et al. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(1)02 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Interacting with Inspectable Bayesian Student Models
Zapata‐Rivera, D., & Greer, J. E. (2004) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2004-14(2)01 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Modelling second language learner creativity
Lessard, G., Maher, D. P., Tomek, I., et al. (1994) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A neural network approach to automatic recognition of children's handwriting
Burns, L., Perkins, S., & Orth, D. (1994) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Pappano, 2012, The year of the MOOC, The New York Times, 2, 2012
- Van Joolingen, 1995, QMaPS: qualitative reasoning for simulation learning environments, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988510 · Cited by 4,133 · see citing works
“the changes in the AI, particularly in application in education, observed that AI, particularly tutoring or instructional systems, have been designed with the objective of solving the different challenges eminent in one-on-one teacher-student tutoring, thereby improving the overall quality of instructors’ work [21].”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings
Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7 · Cited by 1,473 · see citing works
Walter, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education
Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Three Paradigms
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020 · Cited by 991 · see citing works
The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y · Cited by 984 · see citing works
The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning
Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9 · Cited by 788 · see citing works
Self-citationChan, K. S., & Zary, N. (2019) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/13930 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
“Over the past 25 years, there have been significant developments of AI in education [5], with advances such as “teacher bots,” a teaching assistant tasked to deliver content, provide feedback, and supervise progress [6,7].”
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis
Guan, C., Mou, J., & Jiang, Z. (2020) · International Journal of Innovation Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Yigitcanlar, T., Desouza, K., Butler, L., & Roozkhosh, F. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13061473 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
A review on artificial intelligence in education
Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021) · Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies · doi:10.36941/ajis-2021-0077 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university
Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., & Huber, P. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2016.7757570 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Empowering Educators to Be AI-Ready
Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & du Boulay, B. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100076 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Creation and Evaluation of a Pretertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum
Chiu, T. K. F., Meng, H., Chai, C.-S., King, I., Wong, S., & Yam, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2021.3085878 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Human and artificial intelligence collaboration for socially shared regulation in learning
Järvelä, S., Nguyen, A., & Hadwin, A. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13325 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
“Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education,”
Alam, A. (2021) · 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA) · doi:10.1109/iccica52458.2021.9697272 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement: An intervention study
Wang, Y., & Xue, L. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108353 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: the future of artificial intelligence in education
Schiff, D. (2021) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-01033-8 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Power to the Teachers: An Exploratory Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education
Lameras, P., & Arnab, S. (2021) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13010014 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2025) · British Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
How human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements
Glickman, M., & Sharot, T. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02077-2 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Generative artificial intelligence acceptance scale: A validity and reliability study
Yilmaz, F. G. K., Yilmaz, R., & Ceylan, M. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2288730 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
A systematic review of AI role in the educational system based on a proposed conceptual framework
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10774-y · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Chai, C. S., Wang, X., & Xu, C. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8112089 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Applying Artificial Intelligence in Physical Education and Future Perspectives
Lee, H. S., & Lee, J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13010351 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Higher Education Institutions: A Systems Approach
Katsamakas, E., Pavlov, O. V., & Saklad, R. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16146118 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Aims for cultivating students’ key competencies based on artificial intelligence education in China
Huang, X. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10530-2 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Fu, Y., & Weng, Z. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100306 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
From explainable to interactive AI: A literature review on current trends in human-AI interaction
Raees, M., Meijerink, I., Lykourentzou, I., Khan, V.-J., & Papangelis, K. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103301 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Muthmainnah, Ibna Seraj, P. M., & Oteir, I. (2022) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/6468995 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
- Retracted
Hrastinski, S., Olofsson, A. D., Arkenback, C., Ekström, S., Ericsson, E., Fransson, G., Jaldemark, J., Ryberg, T., Öberg, L.-M., Fuentes, A., et al. (2019) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-019-00046-x · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Sharma, S., Mittal, P., Kumar, M., & Bhardwaj, V. (2025) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-025-01094-z · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Educing AI-thinking in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education
How, M.-L., & Hung, W. L. D. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9030184 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Alwaqdani, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12903-9 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Huang, X., & Qiao, C. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00392-6 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Guo, S., Zheng, Y., & Zhai, X. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12491-8 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Charitopoulos, A., Rangoussi, M., & Koulouriotis, D. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00200-8 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Personalised Learning: A Bibliometric Analysis
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T.-M. (2023) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-01-2023-0007 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Park, H., & Ahn, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642785 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Sharma, S., Singh, G., Sharma, C. S., & Kapoor, S. (2024) · International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-023-02193-8 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
The evolution of AI-driven educational systems during the COVID-19 pandemic
Pantelimon, F.-V., Bologa, R., Toma, A., & Posedaru, B.-S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132313501 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Integrating AI and machine learning in STEM education: Challenges and opportunities
Joseph, O. B., & Uzondu, N. C. (2024) · Computer Science & IT Research Journal · doi:10.51594/csitrj.v5i8.1379 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Roll, I., Russell, D. M., & Gašević, D. (2018) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-018-0170-7 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationImran, M., Almusharraf, N., Abdellatif, M. S., & Abbasova, M. Y. (2024) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v18i18.49143 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Ethical use of artificial intelligence and new technologies in Education 5.0
Smyrnaiou, Z., Liapakis, A., & Bougia, A. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science · doi:10.51219/jaimld/anastasios-liapakis/15 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Jamshed, M., Ahmed, A. S. M. M., Sarfaraj, M., & Warda, W. U. (2024) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v18i19.50361 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Ethical and Responsible AI in Education: Situated Ethics for Democratic Learning
Hummel, S. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15121594 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Impact of Artificial Intelligence Versus Traditional Instruction for Language Learning: A Survey
Dhanapal, C., Asharudeen, N., & Alfaruque, S. Y. (2024) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v14n2p182 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Williams, A. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2698137 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
When Can AI Models Explain Learning? Validity Criteria for AI as Cognitive Models in Education
Wang, P., Viberg, O., Law, E. L.-C., & Greiff, S. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10202-y · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges
Güneş Metin, K., & Çetin, M. (2026) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/00472395261415889
Mohasseb, A., Beukman, R., & Kanavos, A. (2026) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai7090328
- Authors
- Roll, I., & Wylie, R.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roll, Ido
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 582-599
- ISSN
- 1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2337155942
- Semantic Scholar
- f90511eb2c969052e44ff0bc675c150e55e0c147
- Cited by
- 1,229
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 288 · 2025: 321 · 2024: 234 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, research foci, teaching practice, teacher collaboration, everyday learning, student-centered learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review