Cited by 37scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

A Bibliometric Analysis of Highly Cited Papers in the Field of Economics and Business Based on the Essential Science Indicators Database

Zhang, Nan, Wan, Shanshan, Wang, Peiling, Zhang, Peng, Wu, Qiang·2018·Scientometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-018-2786-7

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, N., Wan, S., Wang, P., Zhang, P., & Wu, Q.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Qiang
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2018-05-28
Volume
116
Issue
2
Pages
1039-1053
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W2806565222
Cited by
37
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71273250)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
highly cited papers, Essential Science Indicators, top scientists, collaboration networks, h-index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review