Cited by 537scientometrics and bibliometrics researchManagement and Optimization TechniquesPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co‐citation analysis

Pilkington, Alan, Meredith, Jack·2009·Journal of Operations Management

Abstract

Citation analysis combined with a network analysis of co‐citation data from three major operations management (OM) journals is used to reveal the evolution of the intellectual structure of the OM field between 1980 and 2006. This spans the entire time since the beginning of research journals specific to the field. Employing a bibliometric citation/co‐citation analysis to investigate the foundations of the discipline enables a robust, quantitative approach to uncovering the evolution of research in OM. The study finds that the intellectual structure of the field made statistically significant changes between the 1980s, the 1990s, and the 2000s and evolved from a pre‐occupation with narrow, tactical topics toward more strategic, macrotopics, including new research methods and techniques. A factor analysis identifies the 12 top knowledge groups in the field and how they change over the decades. Illustrations of the structure of the co‐citations representing the field are generated from a spring‐embedded algorithm that is an improvement over the standard multi‐dimensional scaling (MDS) approach to illustrating the knowledge groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001

Cites

193 of 193 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J.
Affiliations
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
Venue
Journal of Operations Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-20
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
185-202
ISSN
  • 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1317
OpenAlex
W2137174507
Cited by
537
References
193
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 29
FWCI
9.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Operations Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
operations management, intellectual structure, research evolution, co-citation analysis, citation analysis, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review