Cited by 9scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsLibrary Science and Information

Sources without a CiteScore Value: More Clarity Is Required

Krauskopf, Erwin·2020·Scientometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-020-03350-7

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An empirical investigation found that many sources without CS value were discontinued or newly included in the DB, but several hard-to-explain cases were also found.

    “An empirical investigation has shown that many of the sources without CS value were discontinued or newly included in the DB. Although, several hard to explain cases were also found [259].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krauskopf, E.
Affiliations
Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
Corresponding author
Krauskopf, Erwin
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2020-01-25
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
1801-1812
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W3001776777
Cited by
9
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
CiteScore, journal impact indicators, Scopus, journal discontinuation, journal renaming, citation analysis, library and information science journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review