Cited by 63scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsPublishing and Scholarly Communication

CiteScore Metrics: Creating Journal Metrics from the Scopus Citation Index

Open access
James, Chris, Colledge, Lisa, Meester, Wim, Azoulay, Norman, Plume, Andrew·2019·Learned Publishing

Abstract

Key points: CiteScore was developed to implement familiar calculations but make them more comprehensive and transparent. The justification for a new metric was to complement existing information to allow for comparison and evaluation. CiteScore is available for all newly indexed journals with a publication history of 1 year. CiteScore Tracker is updated monthly to show progress towards the annual snapshot CiteScore. Feedback helps CiteScore develop, for example, by improving the management of title changes. CiteScore provided metrics for 23,350 journals in 2018.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/leap.1246

Cites

19 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Clarivate Analytics. (2017b). Journal Citation Reports : A Primer on the JCR and Journal Impact Factor, 8. Retrieved from http://stateofinnovation.com/journal-citation-reports-a-new-primer
  2. Davis, P. (2016). Can Scopus Deliver A Better Journal Impact Metric? The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/03/07/can-scopus-deliver-a-better- journal-impact-metric/
  3. Matthews, D. (2015). Journal impact factors 'no longer credible.' Retrieved February 1, 2017, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/journal-impact-factors-no-longer-credible
  4. Waltman, L. (CWTS). (2017). Q & A on Elsevier's CiteScore metric, 3-5. Retrieved from https://www.cwts.nl/blog?article=n-q2y254
  5. Waltman, L. (CWTS), & James, C. (2017). What's new in journal metrics -CiteScore and more. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/cjames328/whats-new-in-journal-metrics-cite-score- and-more-29-june-2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
James, C., Colledge, L., Meester, W., Azoulay, N., & Plume, A.
Affiliations
  • Elsevier BV (Netherlands) (NL)
  • RELX Group (United States) (US)
  • RELX Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Learned Publishing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-19
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
367-374
ISSN
  • 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-4857
OpenAlex
W2904865555
Cited by
63
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learned Publishing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
CiteScore, journal metrics, Scopus, citation analysis, journal evaluation, bibliometric analysis, journal indexing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review