Cited by 36Disability Rights and RepresentationGender and Feminist StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Not Doing it Properly? (Re)producing and Resisting Knowledge Through Narratives of Autistic Sexualities

Open access
Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Hanna, Jackson-Perry, David·2021·Sexuality and Disability

Abstract

Autism is conceptualized in much scientific literature as being associated with restricted and repetitive interests, characterized by an ‘empathy deficit’, and negatively impacting social communication. Meanwhile, ‘good and healthy’ sexuality is largely considered to be a social endeavor: asexuality and sexualities defined by acts rather than by partner gender—for example kink or BDSM—are broadly pathologized. Perhaps, therefore, first-hand autistic experiences of sexuality challenge existing assumptions about ‘good and healthy’ sexualities within couplehood. As a theoretical starting point to explore this potential, we revisit Gayle Rubin’s notion of ‘sex within the charmed circle’ to ask whether autistic sexuality can ever truly ‘fit’ within this (neurotypically defined) virtuous sexual arena. We further consider the ways in which the intersection of autism and sexuality is understood and experienced in first-hand autistic accounts of sexuality within a specific context, through analysis of a Swedish online discussion forum in which autistic people discuss sexuality. In doing so we seek both to better understand autistic sexual experience, and to track and deconstruct potentially restrictive assumptions of (non-autistic) couple sexuality more generally. We also consider ways in which assumptions of deficit concerning both non-normative sexualities and autism may have a deleterious effect on autistic people and on research more broadly, limiting theoretical and conceptual understandings of autism and autistic ways of (sexual) being by a default comparison to sexual and neurological norms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11195-020-09624-5

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The change is also beginning to be reflected in academic discussions, with a flurry of review papers, perspective pieces and edited books published in the last 12 months alone.

    “It is also beginning to be reflected in academic discussions, with a flurry of review papers, perspective pieces and edited books published in the last 12 months alone (Bertilsdotter Rosqvist et al., 2020; Bölte, Lawson, Marschik, & Girdler, 2021; Davis & Crompton, 2021; Kapp, 2020; Leadbitter, Buckle, Ellis, & Dekker, 2021; Mitchell et al., 2021; Walker & Raymaker, 2020).”

    From Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science (2022) · cites this paper as Bertilsdotter Rosqvist et al., 2020

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses increasing calls to understand autism through neurodiversity, so this paper is an example of the changing academic discussion. The Materials section (page unavailable) says it analyzes Swedish online-forum threads; it is not a review paper, perspective piece, or edited book, and the copy does not establish a flurry of such publications in the preceding 12 months. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Fletcher-Watson, S., Happé, F.: Autism: A New Introduction to Psychological Theory and Current Debate. Routledge, London (2019)
  2. Chown, N., Robinson, J., Beardon, L., Downing, J., Hughes, L., Leatherland, J., Fox, K., Hickman, L., MacGregor, D.: Improving research about us, with us: a draft framework for inclusive autism research. Disabil. Soc. 32, 720-734 (2017). https ://doi.org/10.1080/09687 599.2017.13202 73 · DOI
  3. Pellicano, L., Mandy, W., Bölte, S., Stahmer, A., Lounds Taylor, J., Mandell, D.S.: A new era for autism research, and for our journal. Autism (2018). https ://doi.org/10.1177/13623 61317 74855 6 · DOI
  4. Masi, A., DeMayo, M.M., Glozier, N., Guastella, A.J.: An overview of autism spectrum disorder, het- erogeneity and treatment options. Neurosci. Bull. 33, 183-193 (2017). https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1226 4-017-0100-y · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kana, R.K., Maximo, J.O., Williams, D.L., Keller, T.A., Schipul, S.E., Cherkassky, V.L., Minshew, N.J., Just, M.A.: Aberrant functioning of the theory-of-mind network in children and adolescents with autism. Mol. Autism 6, 59 (2015). https ://doi.org/10.1186/s1322 9-015-0052-x · DOI
  6. Schaafsma, S.M., Pfaff, D.W., Spunt, R.P., Adolphs, R.: Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 65-72 (2015). https ://doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2014.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Milton, D., Heasman, B., Sheppard, E.: Double Empathy. In: Volkmar, F. (ed.) Encylopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer, New York, NY (2018)
  8. Baron-Cohen, S.: Autism: a specific cognitive disorder of mind-blindness. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2, 81-90 (1990). https ://doi.org/10.3109/09540 26900 90282 74 · DOI
  9. Dinishak, J., Akhtar, N.: A critical examination of mindblindness as a metaphor for autism. Child. Dev. Perspect. 7, 110-114 (2013). https ://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12026 · DOI
  10. Downing, L.: Heteronormativity and repronormativity in sexological "perversion theory" and the DSM-5's "paraphilic disorder" diagnoses. Arch. Sex. Behav. 44, 1139-1145 (2015). https ://doi. org/10.1007/s1050 8-015-0536-y · DOI
  11. Sullivan, N.: A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2003) · DOI
  12. Rubin, G.S.: Deviations: A Gayle Rubin Reader. Duke University Press, Durham (2011). https ://doi. org/10.1215/97808 22394 068 · DOI
  13. Nelson, L.H.: Epistemological communities. In: Alcoff, L., Potter, E. (eds.) Feminist Epistemologies. Routledge, New York (1993)
  14. Murray, S.: Autism. Routledge, New York (2012)
  15. Runswick-Cole, K.: Understanding this thing called autism. In: Runswick-Cole, K., Mallett, R., Timimi, S. (eds.) Re-thinking autism, pp. 19-29. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, Philadelphia (2016)
  16. Silberman, S.: Beyond "Deficit-Based" thinking in autism research: comment on "Implications of the idea of neurodiversity for understanding the origins of developmental disorders" by Nobuo Masataka. Phys. Life Rev. 20, 119-121 (2017). https ://doi.org/10.1016/J.PLREV .2017.01.022 · DOI
  17. Edley, N.: Analysing masculinity: interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject posi- tions. In: Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., Yates, S.J. (eds.) Discourse as Data. A Guide for Analysis. Sage, London (2001)
  18. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D.: Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psy- chology of Everyday Thinking. Sage Publications, London (1988/1989)
  19. Arnold, L.: Introduction. Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies 1 (2012)
  20. Przybylo, E.: Introducing asexuality, unthinking sex. In: Fischer, N., Seidman, S. (eds.) Introducing the New Sexuality Studies, 4th edn, pp. 181-192. Routledge, Oxon (2016)
  21. Lund, E.M., Johnson, B.A.: Asexuality and disability: strange but compatible bedfellows. Sex. Disabil. 33(1), 123-132 (2015). https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1119 5-014-9378-0 · DOI
  22. Cuthbert, K.: You have to be normal to be abnormal: an empirically grounded exploration of the inter- section of asexuality and disability. Sociology 51(2), 241-257 (2017). https ://doi.org/10.1177/00380 38515 58763 9 · DOI
  23. Garland-Thomson, R.: Extraordinary Bodies Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Lit- erature. Columbia University Press, New York (1997)
  24. Barnett, J.P., Maticka-Tyndale, E.: Qualitative exploration of sexual experiences among adults on the autism spectrum: implications for sex education. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health (2015). https ://doi. org/10.1363/47e57 15 · DOI
  25. George, R., Stokes, M.A.: Sexual orientation in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 11, 133-141 (2018). https ://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1892 · DOI
  26. Galupo, M.P., Davis, K.S., Grynkiewicz, A.L., Mitchell, R.C.: Conceptualization of sexual orientation identity among sexual minorities: patterns across sexual and gender identity. J. Bisex. 14, 433-456 (2014). https ://doi.org/10.1080/15299 716.2014.93346 6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H., & Jackson-Perry, D.
Venue
Sexuality and Disability
Published
2020-03-09
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
327-344
ISSN
  • 0146-1044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6717
OpenAlex
W3012202484
Cited by
36
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexuality and Disability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, couple sexuality, non-normative sexuality, asexuality, Gayle Rubin, online forums

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review