The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Confirmation Bias and the Sexual Double Standard
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This insignificant confirmation bias with respect to beliefs about non-social matters contrasts with findings of a significant confirmation bias with respect to beliefs about people (Talaifar and Swann 2017;Goodwin et al. 2000;Marks and Fraley 2006;Darley and Gross 1983), and, as I shall argue now, social affairs whose reality the subject can determine.”
From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Marks and Fraley 2006
Citations
Cites
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.107 · Cited by 1,477
Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction.
Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.11.1202 · Cited by 937
Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224490309552163 · Cited by 860
Informal Reasoning and Education
(2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203052228 · Cited by 708
Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1987) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60417-7 · Cited by 640
Skov, R. B., & Sherman, S. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90031-4 · Cited by 310
Fraley, R. C., Garner, J. P., & Shaver, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.816 · Cited by 307
Self-citationIncrimination through innuendo: Can media questions become public answers?
Wegner, D. M., Wenzlaff, R. M., Kerker, R. M., & Beattie, A. E. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.822 · Cited by 201
The Sexual Double Standard: Fact or Fiction?
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5 · Cited by 198
Self-citationAubrey, J. S. (2004) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/b:sers.0000023070.87195.07 · Cited by 191
Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women
Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (1999) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499909552008 · Cited by 188
Reconceptualizing the Sexual Double Standard
Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (2002) · Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality · doi:10.1300/j056v13n02_05 · Cited by 173
Premarital sexual standards for different categories of individuals
Sprecher, S. (1989) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224498909551508 · Cited by 108
Where ‘angels’ and ‘wusses’ fear to tread: sexual coercion in adolescent dating relationships
Hird, M. J., & Jackson, S. (2001) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/144078301128756184 · Cited by 107
Has the Double Standard Disappeared?: An Experimental Test
Sprecher, S., McKinney, K. G., & Orbuch, T. L. (1987) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2786887 · Cited by 101
Testing Hypotheses about Other People
Snyder, M., & Campbell, B. (1980) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616728063015 · Cited by 93
Oliver, M. B., & Sedikides, C. (1992) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2786800 · Cited by 93
Baron, J. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203052228-14 · Cited by 91
Gentry, M. (1998) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00173.x · Cited by 78
A Revision of the Reiss Premarital Sexual Permissiveness Scale
Sprecher, S., McKinney, K. G., Walsh, R. H., & Anderson, C. (1988) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352650 · Cited by 67
O’Sullivan, L. F. (1995) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf01544609 · Cited by 64
The impact of social interaction on the sexual double standard
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2007) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510601154413 · Cited by 52
Self-citationMark, M. M., & Miller, M. L. (1986) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf00288320 · Cited by 39
Effects of Premarital Sexual Standards and Behavior on Dating and Marriage Desirability
Jacoby, A. P., & Williams, J. D. (1985) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352351 · Cited by 30
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut! New York: Harper Collins.
- White, E. (2002). Fast girls: Teenage tribes and the myth of the slut. New York: Scribner.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0017504 · Cited by 931
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x · Cited by 769
The Sexual Double Standard and Adolescent Peer Acceptance
Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250907200205 · Cited by 333
Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.653699 · Cited by 238
Sexual Double Standard: A Review of the Literature Between 2001 and 2010
Bordini, G. S., & Sperb, T. M. (2012) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-012-9163-0 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marks, Michael J.
- Venue
- Sex Roles
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 19-26
- ISSN
- 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2762
- OpenAlex
- W2100413942
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- sexual double standard, confirmation bias, sexual stereotypes, gender differences in sexual behavior, memory retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
